arXiv:2602. 12323v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The widespread availability of fine-tuned LoRA modules for open pre-trained models has led to an interest in methods that can adaptively merge LoRAs to improve performance.
By Haokun Liu, Gyung Hyun Je, Marco Ciccone, Zhenlin Xu, Prasanth YSS, Colin Raffel
arXiv:2606. 24894v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models have shown strong fluency in scientific writing, yet the evaluation of related work generation (RWG) remains limited.
By Anzhe Xie, Weihang Su, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Shaoping Ma, Qingyao Ai
arXiv:2604. 09558v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the widening gap between compute and memory operation latencies, data movement optimizations have become increasingly important for DNN compilation.
By Muyan Hu, Ahan Gupta, Jiachen Yuan, Vima Gupta, Taeksang Kim, Xin Xu, Janardhan Kulkarni, Ofer Dekel, Vikram Adve, Charith Mendis
arXiv:2308. 13380v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Is it possible to understand the intricacies of a dynamical system not solely from its input/output pattern, but also by observing the behavior of other systems within the same class?
By Marco Forgione, Filippo Pura, Dario Piga
arXiv:2607. 07527v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a double-edged sword: while it has achieved remarkable success across a wide range of domains, its deployment also calls for effective oversight and regulation, for which the detection of AI-related content and artifacts is perhaps the most direct and cost-effective approach.
By Xifeng Zhang, Tao Hu, Yijie Peng, Wan Tian
arXiv:2607. 07033v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large vision-language models incur substantial inference costs because high-resolution inputs introduce thousands of visual tokens, many of which are redundant for a given query.
By Kyuan Oh, Bumsoo Kim
arXiv:2511. 16107v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Visual in-context learning (VICL) solves visual tasks by conditioning on a few input-output demonstrations without any model training.
By Shao-Jun Xia, Huixin Zhang, Zhengzhong Tu
arXiv:2601. 14590v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) provide human-centric interpretability by identifying the minimal, actionable changes required to alter a machine learning model's prediction.
By Shovito Barua Soumma, Asiful Arefeen, Stephanie M. Carpenter, Melanie Hingle, Hassan Ghasemzadeh
arXiv:2607. 06964v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Bridging the gap between human pilot intent and autonomous flight operation is critical for real-world electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft deployment.
By Amin Tabrizian, Arsyi Aziz, Aarifah Ullah, Mahyar Ghazanfari, Pouria Razzaghi, Peng Wei
arXiv:2607. 07316v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This article offers a comprehensive overview of mechanistic interpretability, an emerging field that seeks to reverse-engineer the internal algorithms of modern neural networks.
By Pranav Sawant, Jakub Krej\v{c}\'i
arXiv:2603. 26772v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated semantic annotation of broadcast television content presents distinctive challenges, combining structured audiovisual composition, domain-specific editorial patterns, and strict operational constraints.
By Paolo Cupini, Francesco Pierri
arXiv:2605. 17842v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autoregressive language models execute Transformer layers sequentially, creating a latency bottleneck that is not removed by conventional tensor or pipeline parallelism.
By Ligong Han, Kai Xu, Hao Wang, Akash Srivastava
arXiv:2604. 11840v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Language models are increasingly used to simulate people: survey respondents, negotiators, stakeholders in policy exercises.
By Sandro Andric
arXiv:2607. 07507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucinations in vision language models (VLMs) are commonly treated as semantic errors, yet they often arise from partial or ambiguous visual evidence.
By Feng He, Zhenting Wang, Qifan Wang, Qiang Guan, Dongfang Liu, Ruixiang Tang, Qiankun Li
arXiv:2607. 06854v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning agents for imperfect-information card games are only as strong as the opponents they train against, and they are hard to grade, since they beat a random opponent over 99 percent of the time and only tie copies of themselves.
By Nima Kelidari, Mohammadsaeed Haghi, Mahdi Salmani
arXiv:2607. 07066v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transformers have demonstrated a remarkable ability to learn algorithmic reasoning, yet mechanistic analyses have mostly focused on globally invertible operations such as cyclic addition and group composition.
By Zitong Andrew Chen, Junaid Hasan, Akhil Srinivasan, Hemkesh Bandi, Jarod Alper
arXiv:2508. 17298v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Compositional visual reasoning has emerged as a key research frontier in multimodal AI, aiming to endow machines with the human-like ability to decompose visual scenes, ground intermediate concepts, and perform multi-step logical inference.
By Fucai Ke, Joy Hsu, Zhixi Cai, Zixian Ma, Xin Zheng, Xindi Wu, Sukai Huang, Weiqing Wang, Pari Delir Haghighi, Gholamreza Haffari, Ranjay Krishna, Jiajun Wu, Hamid Rezatofighi
arXiv:2603. 15685v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Omnimodal large language models (OmniLLMs) jointly process audio and visual streams, but the resulting long multimodal token sequences make inference prohibitively expensive.
By Bingzhou Li, Tao Huang
arXiv:2604. 11950v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While recent LLM-based agents can identify many candidate bugs in source code, their reports remain static hypotheses that require manual validation, limiting the practicality of automated bug detection.
By Zijie Zhao, Chenyuan Yang, Weidong Wang, Yihan Yang, Ziqi Zhang, Lingming Zhang
arXiv:2607. 07128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models perform a wide range of tasks at varying levels of abstraction with the capacity to flexibly infer tasks from context, execute multiple tasks simultaneously, and select among competing tasks.
By Maximilian S. Ernst (Max Planck School of Cognition, Center for Lifespan Psychology Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Machine Learning Group Technische Universit\"at Berlin), Lorenz Linhardt (Machine Learning Group Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data), Aaron Peikert (Center for Lifespan Psychology Max Planck Institute for Human Development), Oliver Eberle (Machine Learning Group Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data)