arXiv:2609.37581v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual understanding and reasoning but often incur substantial inference costs due to the large number of visu...
By Jing Wang, Zhiping Wu, Dongdong Ren, Youfang Han, Wei Zhao, Wenbin Li
arXiv:2609.16841v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Increasing image resolution produces ever-longer visual-token sequences in vision-language models (VLMs), substantially raising their inference cost....
By Zhenbin Wang, Lei Zhang, Lituan Wang, Wei Huang, Yan Wang, Zhenwei Zhang
QCPruner is a training‑free visual token pruning method that conditions both token selection and representation on the query via bilateral utility weighting. It fuses keyword‑matched query anchors with cross‑modal cues to compute a nonnegative facility‑location objective that is monotone and submodular, guaranteeing a (1‑1/e) greedy approximation. Across multiple multimodal large language models, QCPruner consistently outperforms existing pruning methods, achieving over 96% of unpruned performance even with very few tokens retained.
By Shengli He (Guizhou University), Yongchao Liang (Guizhou University), Roumeng He (Shanghai Ocean University), Junjie Zeng (Guizhou University), Jiyuan He (Guizhou University), Can Wu (Guizhou University), Li Zheng (Guizhou University)
arXiv:2607. 23913v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly rely on dynamic or high-resolution visual encoding, producing thousands of visual tokens that substantially increase downstream language-model inference cost.
By Jun Ling, Tao Huang, Junzhuo Liu, Bowen Tang, Peng Wang
SinkPruner is a training‑free framework that prunes visual tokens for multimodal large language models by first removing high‑norm redundant tokens with a visual sanitizer and then selectively keeping tokens that align with the text query using a text‑guided pruner. The coarse‑to‑fine design reduces attention sink and dispersion, enabling an 89% token reduction while preserving 96.5% of LLaVA‑1.5’s performance and 91.8% of Qwen2.5‑VL’s performance across twelve image‑language and four video‑language benchmarks. The visual sanitizer also improves existing pruning methods, showing strong transferability.
By Shiyu Li, Zi-Yuan Hu, Shijia Huang, Yanyang Li, Yiwu Zhong, Liwei Wang
arXiv:2609.34330v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in multimodal understanding, but processing large numbers of visu...
By Tinghao Wang, Yichen Guo, Qizhe Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Weimin Ouyang, Rui Huang, Jiajun Cao, Sixiang Chen, Hao Jiang, Jixian Wu, Zheng Lu, Bofan Zhu, Renyuan Li, Shanghang Zhang
ET‑Prune is a training‑free framework that dynamically allocates visual token budgets in multimodal large language models based on question‑conditioned evidence. It protects text‑like spatial regions, converts evidence uncertainty into a token floor, and progressively prunes concentrated evidence while retaining diffuse or text‑dense tokens. In six backbone‑benchmark comparisons, ET‑Prune matches or outperforms other pruned methods while keeping roughly half the visual tokens, achieving notable gains on OCRBench‑v2 and MMBench v1.1.
By Zizhong Ding, Junxian Li, Kai Liu, Shaoqiu Zhang, Xiao Xiao, Linghe Kong, Yulun Zhang
arXiv:2606. 27161v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, but their efficiency is limited by the large number of visual tokens, which introduces substantial computational overhead.
By Tinghao Wang, Yichen Guo, Rui Huang, Zheng Lu, Qizhe Zhang, Chenxi Li, Yuan Zhang, Jiajun Cao, Zhirong Shen, Yaosong Du, Guangyan Gan, Wenya Wang, Lin William Cong, Shanghang Zhang
arXiv:2609.05916v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) achieve strong multimodal understanding, but the hundreds to thousands of visual tokens they process impose subs...
By Yichen Guo, Tinghao Wang, Qizhe Zhang, Lingbei Meng, Yuan Zhang, Jiajun Cao, Hao Jiang, Chenwei Wu, Jixian Wu, Sixiang Chen, Tao Luo, Hongyang Cheng, Kai Tang, Chenxi Li, Renyuan Li, Xiande Huang, Wenya Wang, Shanghang Zhang
Multi-vector vision-language retrieval preserves fine-grained visual evidence through maximum-similarity late interaction, but dense image-side tokens make storage and scoring expensive. Existing token compression methods reduce this cost, yet they can remove or collapse object- and region-level evidence that future query tokens may need to select.
arXiv:2609.36916v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) incur high inference latency from long visual token sequences. Existing pruning methods commonly use attention...
By Weixuan Li, Zikun Zhou, Xinyi Zhuang, Xinyan Guo, Rui Tian, Chuyao Zhang, Lin Gao
The paper shows that only a small subset of attention heads in vision-language models is responsible for selecting critical visual tokens. By pruning tokens based on similarity before LLM reasoning and then applying head‑aware pruning during reasoning, the proposed ProViP framework achieves high task performance with significant speedups. Experiments on LLaVA‑1.5‑7B demonstrate 95.9% performance retention and a 1.62× inference speedup at an 88.9% pruning ratio.
By Chaofang Ma, Lin Jiang, Carol Jingyi Li, Xingyu Liu, Zeyu Li, Jiang Xu, Wei Zhang