Benchmarks and evaluation

Leaderboards, eval harnesses and ablations — the contested business of deciding which model is actually better.

28,111 stories · RSS feed

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 27

Multi-Agent Relay Thinking

arXiv:2610.35219v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing multi-agent collaboration (MAC) methods have primarily explored a group thinking collaboration topology, where agents independently generate s...

By Xu Liu, Jungang Qiao, Guikun Chen, Xiaojuan Qi, Wenguan Wang
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Optimal Correction Sets for Provable Redress of Contestable Causal Discovery

The paper introduces a method called OptABA-PC that treats the repair of conflicting conditional‑independence tests in constraint‑based causal discovery as a minimum‑cost correction problem. Implemented in Answer Set Programming, it provides sound and complete guarantees, ensures subset‑minimality and cost optimality of the repair, and offers conflict‑based justifications for released facts. Empirical results show that OptABA-PC retains more correct facts, reduces ambiguity, and improves graph reconstruction compared to previous Causal ABA approaches.

By Fabrizio Russo, Giuseppe Mazzotta, Carmine Dodaro, Francesco Ricca, Francesca Toni
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Isharah-Selfie: Continuous Sign Language Recognition Dataset for One-handed Signing

Isharah‑Selfie is a large‑scale Arabic Sign Language dataset collected entirely with front‑facing smartphone cameras in unconstrained selfie conditions. It contains 8,997 video clips from 16 signers across 1,493 unique sentences, annotated with gloss sequences for continuous sign language recognition and Arabic sentence translations for sign language translation. The dataset focuses on realistic mobile communication, featuring one‑handed signing, close‑range viewpoints, partial body visibility, camera motion, unconstrained environments, and heterogeneous device resolutions, and introduces signer‑independent and unseen‑sentence evaluation protocols.

By Ahmed Abul Hasanaath, Murtadha Aljubran, Sarah Alyami, Muhammad Haris Khan, Hamzah Luqman
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Distilling Expert Judgment at Scale

The paper proposes a method to capture expert human judgment and reasoning for automated evaluation systems that can scale across high‑stakes domains such as healthcare, defense, finance, governance, and politics. By assembling expert networks and encoding their reasoning into structured editorial standards, the authors demonstrate that automated judges trained on these standards outperform uncalibrated frontier models on source‑quality and neutrality metrics in AI news reporting. The study validates the approach with strong inter‑annotator agreement and high F1 scores, suggesting a viable framework for expert‑calibrated evaluation in any domain where expertise is scarce.

By Robbie Goldfarb, Andrew B. Hall, Jillian Fisher, Kathryn Salam, Matt Wilde
arXiv AI
Oct 27

AdaPRA: Process Reward Agents with Adaptive Rubrics for Data Science

AdaPRA is a process reward agent that uses adaptive rubrics to supervise data science agents, correcting errors such as insufficient exploration, unsound validation, coding bugs, and inefficient budget use. It accumulates knowledge across multiple attempts on the same task and adapts its rubrics to each new task, improving performance on DSPredict-Easy and DSPredict-Hard benchmarks. The approach outperforms existing methods like DataPRM and demonstrates that rubrics mined from one model can benefit another, with code released for reproducibility.

By Atharva Naik, Vivek Chari, Pol Llado, Daniel Fried, Carolyn Ros\'e, Benjamin Van Durme, Sam Thomson, Justin Svegliato
arXiv AI
Oct 27

BenchBench-Cloning: Evaluating Molecular Cloning Design and Protocol Development

BenchBench‑Cloning is a new benchmark for evaluating large language models on end‑to‑end molecular cloning tasks. It contains 65 tasks drawn from real sequence records, laboratory notebooks, and published studies, split into 50 protocol‑development tasks and 15 construct‑design tasks. Performance is measured by simulation execution for protocols and deterministic or rubric‑based checks for design, with GPT‑6 Astra achieving the highest score of 30.6% among eight tested systems.

By Aditya Sivakumar, Peter Ciaccia, Hassaan Qadir, Ian Hsu, Ashu Singhal
arXiv AI
Oct 27

TempShap: When and How Much a Feature Matters in Time-Series Forecasting

TempShap introduces a Shapley-based framework that attributes importance to individual time‑step and feature cells in a time‑series forecast, providing both temporal localization and horizon‑impact profiles. Unlike traditional Shapley explainers that treat each feature as a single player, TempShap’s cell‑level approach captures when and how much a feature matters across the forecast horizon. The method is validated through planted temporal structures, exact cell games, and a closed‑form oracle for linear forecasters, and demonstrates improved deletion‑ranking performance over existing estimators.

By Chi Zhao, Anastasiia Chelnokova, Jing Liu, Elena Parilina
arXiv AI
Oct 27

ConMem: Counterfactual Multi-Scenario Probing for Resolving LLM Memory Misalignment

The paper introduces ConMem, an algorithm that uses counterfactual causal inference to improve long‑term memory management in large language model agents. It builds a benchmark called MemAlign with 1,079 curated memory cases that capture various misalignment issues such as over‑generalization, misattribution, and privacy concerns. ConMem generates counterfactual interaction scenarios to audit retention decisions, leading to higher accuracy (75.16%) and better balance than existing methods while preserving personalization.

By Shuning Zhang, Tenghao Ji, Jingruo Chen, Eryue Xu, Bohao Chu, Xin Yi
arXiv AI
Oct 27

SkillShift-Bench: Benchmarking Skill Learning under Environment Evolution for Web Agents

SkillShift-Bench is a new benchmark that evaluates web agents’ skill learning under controlled open-environment shifts, including Contextual, Perceptual, and Execution shifts across three self-hosted web systems. It measures task success, interaction cost, skill use, and skill failure, revealing that skill robustness degrades systematically—especially under Execution Shift. The benchmark also frames shifted skill execution as a nonstationary local executability problem, offering a dynamic-regret analysis and a test-time adaptation method to improve skill execution without relearning.

By Bo-Yu Chen, Zhi Zhou, Yu-Feng Li
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Graph-dependent pooling: adaptive granularity in hierarchical graph neural networks

Graph-Dependent Pooling (GDPool) introduces a dynamic approach to hierarchical graph pooling, allowing each graph to determine its own pooling granularity rather than relying on fixed cluster numbers or ratios. The method employs self-attention to select graph-specific anchors and uses soft node assignment to build coarser graphs, addressing optimization conflicts identified through gradient alignment analysis. Experiments on metal‑organic framework and molecular graph datasets demonstrate that GDPool outperforms existing methods in predictive accuracy, modularity, and exhibits stable behavior across various hyperparameters.

By Bohan Yoon, Hyejin Jang
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Meta-CLIP: Metadata-Conditioned Contrastive Learning for Zero-Shot Disease Inference

Meta-CLIP is a metadata‑conditioned contrastive learning framework that incorporates DICOM acquisition information to reweight cross‑modal negatives during medical vision‑language pretraining. By defining a bounded pairwise margin over numerical and categorical DICOM fields, the method emphasizes distinctions among studies with similar imaging conditions while keeping the kernel fixed during optimization. Evaluations on chest radiography and volumetric CT show that Meta‑CLIP improves zero‑shot classification performance, achieving higher macro‑AUROC scores than baseline CLIP models on multiple benchmarks.

By Haozhe Luo, Nirosh Sivanesan, Shelley Zixin Shu, Francesco Nitti, Mauricio Reyes
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Are We Done with UMLS Injection into Language Models for Medical Question Answering?

The paper questions the effectiveness of injecting the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) into language models for medical question answering (MQA). It reviews current MQA studies, identifies methodological shortcomings such as limited UMLS coverage and weak subgraph retrieval, and finds that UMLS-based graph injection often yields only modest performance gains. The authors propose actionable recommendations to better harness UMLS as an external knowledge source.

By Yiran Zeng, Giacomo Frisoni, Lorenzo Molfetta, Gianluca Moro
arXiv AI
Oct 27

ReGE: Stronger Agents through Experience Synthesis

ReGE is a framework that transforms recorded interactive task experience into guidance for new attempts. Its implementation, ReGE‑Syn, synthesizes execution records and artifacts into concise, self‑contained instructions using a single coach call, without updating model parameters. Experiments on four benchmarks show that ReGE improves accuracy by roughly 9–10 percentage points for GPT and Claude, and significantly reduces guidance‑construction tokens while maintaining success rates.

By Jiarong Liang, Yubo Wang, Zijie Liu, Yuxuan Zhang, Ping Nie, Wenhu Chen
arXiv AI
Oct 27

CTXAgent - Self-Controlled Context Management of LLM Agents

The paper introduces CTXAgent, a self‑controlled context management system for large language model agents that compacts conversation history when a token threshold is reached. It evaluates seven frontier models, comparing their ability to manage context with and without dedicated tools, and benchmarks performance across coding, scientific, and software engineering tasks. Results show that well‑managed models keep live context below 100k tokens, maintain high benchmark scores, and achieve significant cost reductions, with Claude Opus 5.5 outperforming its explicit configuration by 34% lower cost.

By Matthias Busch, Marius Tacke, Roland C. Aydin, Christian Feiler, Christian J. Cyron
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Rethinking Verification in Agent Harnesses

The paper investigates how to structure verification in agent harnesses that let large language models use tools and iteratively refine their outputs. It evaluates 17 verification designs across four lifecycle layers—initial instructions, mid‑turn reminders, completion gates, and independent review—on coding benchmarks (Terminal‑Bench and SWE‑bench) and a new VisualBench for visual artifacts. The results show that independent review by a critic consistently improves accuracy with modest cost increases, outperforming other designs and offering a practical strategy for test‑time scaling.

By Zhengxin Zhang, Erkang Zhu, Yin Lin, Claire Cardie, Bolin Ding, Jingren Zhou
arXiv AI
Oct 27

CSI-TextBench: A Dataset and Benchmark for Language-Grounded Ambient Sensing Perception

CSI-TextBench is a large‑scale dataset and benchmark that aligns WiFi Channel State Information (CSI) with natural language, combining 285,790 samples from three sensing benchmarks into 2.0 million CSI‑text training tuples. It pairs these samples with 2,291 hierarchically structured, label‑derived descriptions across seven tasks, enabling many‑to‑many alignment. Benchmarking five alignment methods shows that contrastive CSI‑text models can match supervised classifiers, generalize to unseen classes with few samples, and answer compositional queries, achieving 86.9% top‑1 accuracy on 140 composite scenes.

By Guozhen Zhu, Yuqian Hu, Sakila S Jayaweera, Wei-Hsiang Wang, Beibei Wang, K. J. Ray Liu