arXiv AI By Atharva Naik, Vivek Chari, Pol Llado, Daniel Fried, Carolyn Ros\'e, Benjamin Van Durme, Sam Thomson, Justin Svegliato

AdaPRA: Process Reward Agents with Adaptive Rubrics for Data Science

Read the original on arXiv AI →

AdaPRA is a process reward agent that uses adaptive rubrics to supervise data science agents, correcting errors such as insufficient exploration, unsound validation, coding bugs, and inefficient budget use. It accumulates knowledge across multiple attempts on the same task and adapts its rubrics to each new task, improving performance on DSPredict-Easy and DSPredict-Hard benchmarks. The approach outperforms existing methods like DataPRM and demonstrates that rubrics mined from one model can benefit another, with code released for reproducibility.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 2

It Takes Workflows to Evolve Better Workflows

The paper "It Takes Workflows to Evolve Better Workflows" introduces FloWright, a method that uses a hierarchical, structure‑aware reward system to allow one or more roles in a multi‑agent workflow to self‑evolve without extra models or data. It also proposes DataWright, an adaptive data hardening technique that transforms existing datasets into more challenging workflow‑level tasks. Experiments on document, slide, chart, code, math, and finance tasks show that small open models trained with FloWright can improve performance by up to +7.41%, with co‑evolving multiple roles yielding the largest gains. "whyItMatters":"The work demonstrates that optimizing beyond the workflow generator—by enabling multiple agents to co‑evolve—can substantially enhance the effectiveness of multi‑agent workflows for complex real‑world tasks."

By Xuehang Guo, Haoyu Wang, Haifeng Chen, Yangyi Chen, Zhenhailong Wang, Qingyun Wang
arXiv AI
Jul 8

KAT-Coder-V2.5 Technical Report

arXiv:2607. 05471v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present KAT-Coder-V2.

By Bo Huang, Fengxiang Li, Hao Xu, Haoyang Huang, Hongyi Fu, Jinhua Hao, Kun Yuan, Minglei Zhang, Pengcheng Xu, Shiyang Liu, Wenhao Zhuang, Yuze Shi, Zongxian Feng, Chao Wang, Cheng He, Chongling Rao, Deyu Cao, Fan Yang, Gang Xiong, Haochen Liu, Jiabao Li, Jian Liang, Jinghui Jia, Jingwen Chang, Jun Du, Junyu Shi, Min Li, Mingqi Wu, Qiang Gao, Shangpeng Yan, Shaotong Qi, Shu Xu, Shuo Zhou, Tiankuo Xu, Tong Zheng, Weilun Zhao, Xiancheng Meng, Xianda Sun, Xiaoyu Jiang, Xunhao Jia, Yao Xia, Yimeng Xu, Yinghan Cui, Yingpeng Chen, Yiwen Ning, Yong Wang, Yuxuan Sun, Zhongsheng Liu, Ming Sun, Cheng Luo, Chen Yang, Han Li, Kun Gai
arXiv AI
Oct 7

DAEDALUS: Bootstrapping Agent Memory from Self-Generated Tasks

DAEDALUS is a method that builds reusable memory for large‑language‑model agents by having an explorer agent generate self‑created tasks and a solver agent attempt them. When the solver fails, a heuristic is extracted and only accepted after repeated successful use, then added to a memory bank for future test‑time use. Experiments on AppWorld, τ²‑bench, and AutomationBench show that DAEDALUS raises mean success rates by up to 15.9 points and pass⁵ by up to 2.2× compared to a no‑memory baseline, while also providing a cost‑effective alternative to training‑task or oracle‑verifier approaches.

By Antoine Edy, Max Conti, Victor Xing, Marc-Antoine Allard, Nawfal Benhamdane, Gautier Viaud
arXiv AI
Oct 12

SWE-Critix: Post-Training Generalist Verifiers for Assessing Coding-Agent Trajectories

SWE-Critix is a post‑training pipeline that creates generalist verifiers for coding‑agent trajectories. It uses supervised fine‑tuning followed by reinforcement learning to train 30B models on CodeForge‑Preview data, enabling the verifier to predict completion labels and generate natural‑language explanations. The approach raises classification accuracy from 57% to 78% on a held‑out test set.

By Jiajun Hu, Chun Yong Chong
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

OS-Marathon: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agents on Vast-Horizon, Repetitive Tasks

OS-Marathon is a new benchmark that tests computer‑use agents on vast‑horizon, repetitive tasks, covering 100 tasks across five scenarios and ten domains. The study shows that current state‑of‑the‑art agents perform poorly on these tasks, and that simply decomposing workflows into subtasks does not solve the problem. Introducing a cost‑friendly personalization method called GraphDemo, which adapts agents from a single human demonstration, improves performance, highlighting the value of human guidance for these challenging tasks.

By Jing Wu, Wenjie Ai, Daphne Barretto, Yiye Chen, Qingyu Chen, Yuhang He, Pranit Chawla, Nicholas Gyd\'e, Yanan Jian, Vibhav Vineet