arXiv:2606. 17803v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models achieve strong reasoning performance by scaling inference-time compute, yet remain fundamentally stateless, discarding the rich, self-produced reasoning traces generated during this process.
By Vaggelis Dorovatas, Nancy Kalaj, Rahaf Aljundi
arXiv:2606. 17687v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite remarkable performance on complex tasks, Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often generate excessively long Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT), inflating computational costs even for simple queries.
By Jiahao Wang, Bingyu Liang, Chenhao Hu, Longhui Zhang, Xuebo Liu, Min zhang, Jing Li, Xuelong Li
arXiv:2510.27042v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Increasing the thinking budget of AI models can significantly improve accuracy, but not all questions warrant the same amount of reasoning. Users m...
By Michael Kleinman, Matthew Trager, Alessandro Achille, Wei Xia, Stefano Soatto
The paper demonstrates that fine‑tuning reasoning models to predict their own confidence at intermediate steps—using only 600 self‑supervised examples—substantially improves inference efficiency. Without adding any explicit stopping or length penalties, the models generate up to 25 % fewer tokens while maintaining accuracy on mathematical, scientific, and coding benchmarks across several architectures. The study finds that confidence supervision preserves the models’ high‑level reasoning structure rather than merely suppressing specific behaviors.
By Parsa Hosseini, Akasha Tigalappanavara, Sumit Nawathe, Chenrui Fan, Sourya Basu, Genta Indra Winata, Anirban Das, Soheil Feizi, Nima Chitsazan
arXiv:2510. 18814v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Can language models improve their reasoning performance without external rewards, using only their own sampled responses for training?
By Mengqi Li, Lei Zhao, Anthony Man-Cho So, Ruoyu Sun, Xiao Li
arXiv:2606. 19919v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large reasoning models rely on long chain-of-thought to achieve strong performance, but applying such reasoning uniformly incurs high computational cost.
By Tingyun Li, Zishang Jiang, Jinyi Han, Xinyi Wang, Sihang Jiang, Han Xia, Zhaoqian Dai, Shuguang Ma, Fei Yu, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao
arXiv:2610.34137v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) enables large language models (LLMs) to continuously self-improve their reasoning capabilities....
By Wenhang Shi, Yiren Chen, Zhe Zhao, Jinhao Dong, Wei Lu, Xiaoyong Du
arXiv:2605.06165v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) accelerates, token consumption from intermediate reasoning traces increasingly contribut...
By Richmond Sin Jing Xuan, Rishabh Bhardwaj, Soujanya Poria
The paper introduces T2T (Thickening-to-Thinning), a dynamic reward framework for large language models that mimics human learning by separating exploration and consolidation phases. During incorrect attempts, T2T encourages exploration to broaden the search space, while after correct solutions it applies length penalties to promote concise reasoning. Experiments on mathematical benchmarks across five mainstream LLMs show that T2T outperforms standard GRPO and recent baselines, improving overall reasoning performance.
By Wenze Lin, Zhen Yang, Xitai Jiang, Xiaoteng Ma, Gao Huang
arXiv:2606. 07108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) demonstrate remarkable performance improvements by iteratively reflecting, exploring, and executing complex tasks, yet suffer from inefficiencies due to redundant reasoning, known as "overthinking".
By Tengyao Tu, Yulin Li, Hui-Ling Zhen, Libo Qin, Zhoujun Wei, Jinghua Piao, Zhuotao Tian, Yong Li, Min Zhang
SynCo is a data synthesis co‑training framework that enables self‑evolving large language models (LLMs) to improve autonomously. It employs two agents—a Synthesizer that generates training tasks based on the Reasoner’s evolving capabilities, and a Reasoner that learns from these tasks—using multi‑agent reinforcement learning to jointly optimize task quality and model performance. Experiments on eight mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that SynCo outperforms existing synthetic‑data methods, especially on previously unsolved problems.
By Wei Yang, Shawn Li, Yuehan Qin, Yawei Wang, Mingxi Wang, Shixuan Li, Tiankai Yang, Jiate Li, Jesse Thomason, Xuezhe Ma, Yue Zhao
arXiv:2607. 19962v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking due to redundant verification steps.
By Xinbang Dai, Zheyu Xin, Huikang Hu, Lin Ren, Rihui Jin, Guohui Xiao, Guilin Qi, Kuicai Dong, Zhaocheng Du, Yuyang Zhang