The paper "It Takes Workflows to Evolve Better Workflows" introduces FloWright, a method that uses a hierarchical, structure‑aware reward system to allow one or more roles in a multi‑agent workflow to self‑evolve without extra models or data. It also proposes DataWright, an adaptive data hardening technique that transforms existing datasets into more challenging workflow‑level tasks. Experiments on document, slide, chart, code, math, and finance tasks show that small open models trained with FloWright can improve performance by up to +7.41%, with co‑evolving multiple roles yielding the largest gains.
"whyItMatters":"The work demonstrates that optimizing beyond the workflow generator—by enabling multiple agents to co‑evolve—can substantially enhance the effectiveness of multi‑agent workflows for complex real‑world tasks."
By Xuehang Guo, Haoyu Wang, Haifeng Chen, Yangyi Chen, Zhenhailong Wang, Qingyun Wang
arXiv:2607. 05471v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present KAT-Coder-V2.
By Bo Huang, Fengxiang Li, Hao Xu, Haoyang Huang, Hongyi Fu, Jinhua Hao, Kun Yuan, Minglei Zhang, Pengcheng Xu, Shiyang Liu, Wenhao Zhuang, Yuze Shi, Zongxian Feng, Chao Wang, Cheng He, Chongling Rao, Deyu Cao, Fan Yang, Gang Xiong, Haochen Liu, Jiabao Li, Jian Liang, Jinghui Jia, Jingwen Chang, Jun Du, Junyu Shi, Min Li, Mingqi Wu, Qiang Gao, Shangpeng Yan, Shaotong Qi, Shu Xu, Shuo Zhou, Tiankuo Xu, Tong Zheng, Weilun Zhao, Xiancheng Meng, Xianda Sun, Xiaoyu Jiang, Xunhao Jia, Yao Xia, Yimeng Xu, Yinghan Cui, Yingpeng Chen, Yiwen Ning, Yong Wang, Yuxuan Sun, Zhongsheng Liu, Ming Sun, Cheng Luo, Chen Yang, Han Li, Kun Gai
arXiv:2409. 11363v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI agents have the potential to aid users on a variety of consequential tasks, including conducting scientific research.
By Zachary S. Siegel, Sayash Kapoor, Nitya Nadgir, Benedikt Stroebl, Arvind Narayanan
DAEDALUS is a method that builds reusable memory for large‑language‑model agents by having an explorer agent generate self‑created tasks and a solver agent attempt them. When the solver fails, a heuristic is extracted and only accepted after repeated successful use, then added to a memory bank for future test‑time use. Experiments on AppWorld, τ²‑bench, and AutomationBench show that DAEDALUS raises mean success rates by up to 15.9 points and pass⁵ by up to 2.2× compared to a no‑memory baseline, while also providing a cost‑effective alternative to training‑task or oracle‑verifier approaches.
By Antoine Edy, Max Conti, Victor Xing, Marc-Antoine Allard, Nawfal Benhamdane, Gautier Viaud
SWE-Critix is a post‑training pipeline that creates generalist verifiers for coding‑agent trajectories. It uses supervised fine‑tuning followed by reinforcement learning to train 30B models on CodeForge‑Preview data, enabling the verifier to predict completion labels and generate natural‑language explanations. The approach raises classification accuracy from 57% to 78% on a held‑out test set.
By Jiajun Hu, Chun Yong Chong
OS-Marathon is a new benchmark that tests computer‑use agents on vast‑horizon, repetitive tasks, covering 100 tasks across five scenarios and ten domains. The study shows that current state‑of‑the‑art agents perform poorly on these tasks, and that simply decomposing workflows into subtasks does not solve the problem. Introducing a cost‑friendly personalization method called GraphDemo, which adapts agents from a single human demonstration, improves performance, highlighting the value of human guidance for these challenging tasks.
By Jing Wu, Wenjie Ai, Daphne Barretto, Yiye Chen, Qingyu Chen, Yuhang He, Pranit Chawla, Nicholas Gyd\'e, Yanan Jian, Vibhav Vineet
Neuroscience data are fragmented across labs and formats, making reuse labor‑intensive. This study benchmarks coding agents on eight recent mouse neural recording papers, asking them to reformat data for a common decoder task. While agents handle many subtasks, they rarely produce fully error‑free solutions; the authors pair outcome metrics with a process rubric to evaluate errors and propose agent‑assisted data‑sharing practices.
By Ling-Qi Zhang, Kristin Branson
Agentick is a unified benchmark for sequential decision‑making agents that evaluates RL, LLM, VLM, hybrid, and human agents on 37 procedurally generated tasks across six capability categories, four difficulty levels, and five observation modalities via a single Gymnasium‑compatible interface. It includes a Coding API, oracle reference policies, pre‑built SFT datasets, a composable agent harness, and a live leaderboard. An evaluation of 27 configurations and over 90,000 episodes shows no single approach dominates, with GPT‑5 mini leading overall, PPO excelling in planning and multi‑agent tasks, and the reasoning harness boosting LLM performance by 3‑10×, while ASCII observations outperform natural language.
By Roger Creus Castanyer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Glen Berseth
arXiv:2602. 02905v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) promise to accelerate scientific discovery end-to-end, but rigorously evaluating their capacity for verifiable discovery remains a central challenge.
By Zhen Wang, Fan Bai, Zhongyan Luo, Jinyan Su, Kaiser Sun, Xinle Yu, Jieyuan Liu, Kun Zhou, Claire Cardie, Mark Dredze, Zhiting Hu, Eric P. Xing
The paper introduces Test-Time Adaptation through Human‑Agent Interaction (TAHI), a method that uses iterative human feedback to adapt AI agents to individual users’ criteria. By integrating cross‑session interaction data into agent context and weights, and building an evolving rubric module, the authors demonstrate that agents can improve task success by 4.5–20.9% after only a few interactions. The evolving rubric also serves as a scalable annotation tool, detecting 16.0–22.3% more failures than language models or humans alone, and personalized agents can even generalize improvements up to 8.8% across users.
By Zora Zhiruo Wang, Apurva Gandhi, Rulin Shao, Aspen Chen, Jonas Mueller, Zhiqi Liang, Jett Chen, Michael Ryan, Qianou Ma, Luxi He, Zhoujun Cheng, Andre He, Seungone Kim, Jiayi Geng, Mingqian Zheng, Weiwei Sun, Zheyuan Zhang, Xinran Zhao, Yike Wang, Abe Hou, Liwei Jiang, Pang Wei Koh, Diyi Yang, Graham Neubig, Daniel Fried
arXiv:2610.32441v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of supporting scientific workflows, but their capabilities across diverse research activitie...
By Tianyun Zhong, Wei Wang, Jialin Li, Jianhong Tu, Liyao Li, Chuqiao Kuang, Tianshi Zheng, Songchi Zhou, Weiqi Zhai, Qile Jin, Jiajia Li, Jiasheng Zheng, Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Shiwei Ye, Bing Zhao, Hu Wei, Lin Qu, Xianpei Han
arXiv:2605. 28556v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As agent capabilities advance, existing benchmarks, such as $\tau^2$-Bench, are becoming increasingly saturated.
By Tomer Keren, Nitay Calderon, Asaf Yehudai, Yotam Perlitz, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Roi Reichart