Benchmarks and evaluation

Leaderboards, eval harnesses and ablations — the contested business of deciding which model is actually better.

28,127 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Oct 15

RealityBench: Simulated Environments to Evaluate a Vision Language Model's Ability to Document Human Physical Work

arXiv:2610.14397v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Augmenting worker capabilities in the physical world through guidance has been a decades-long goal for AI agents. One key supporting capability is to...

By Andrew Perrault (Relantic, Inc., Columbus, OH, USA), Anmol Takiar (Relantic, Inc., Columbus, OH, USA), Dominik Winecki (Relantic, Inc., Columbus, OH, USA), Arnab Nandi (Relantic, Inc., Columbus, OH, USA)
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 15

QuantEval: A Benchmark for Financial Quantitative Tasks in Large Language Models

arXiv:2601.08689v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in finance-oriented question answering, yet their evaluation on professional quantitati...

By Zhaolu Kang, Junhao Gong, Wenqing Hu, Yingjie He, Kehan Jiang, Leqi Zheng, Shuo Yin, Zhicheng Fang, Chunlei Meng, Eric Hanchen Jiang, Yunfei Feng, Yitong Leng, Junfan Zhu, Xiaoyou Chen, Xi Yang, Richeng Xuan
arXiv AI
Oct 15

Evolving in Thought Space: Training a Small Model at Test Time Unlocks Better Discoveries

arXiv:2610.06269v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Open-ended scientific discovery often requires repeatedly proposing and evaluating candidate solutions. LLM-based systems can support this process...

By Chonghe Jiang, Ao Qu, Siyuan Liu, Ruoyun Ma, Zijian Zhou, Dingyi Zhuang, Bo Liu, Han Zheng, Hanfei Yu, Baichuan Mo, Jinhua Zhao, Paul Pu Liang
arXiv AI
Oct 15

Revealing the Gap in Human and VLM Scene Description through Counterfactual Semantic Saliency

The paper introduces Counterfactual Semantic Saliency (CSS), a black-box, model-agnostic method that measures how the removal of objects from a scene shifts the semantic description produced by vision‑language models (VLMs). Using CSS, the authors compare prominent VLMs to a large human psychophysics baseline (16,603 responses across 307 scenes) and find that VLMs over‑rely on large, centrally located, and highly salient objects, while under‑rely on people compared to humans. The study highlights a significant scene‑comprehension gap between VLMs and human perception, with size bias emerging as a key factor driving model‑human divergence.

By Ziqi Wen, Parsa Madinei, Miguel P. Eckstein