Increasing demand for precise and reliable control in complex scenarios has led to the development of increasingly sophisticated controllers, including data-driven approaches employing closed box models and mathematically rigorous yet complex designs. This complexity highlights the needs for explainable control that can provide human-understandable insights into controller behavior.
Group-based reinforcement learning effectively post-trains LLM agents for long-horizon, sparse-reward tasks by deriving step-level credit from trajectory outcomes. However, this ties a step's credit to its rollout's final outcome: semantically near-identical intermediate steps receive opposite credit depending on whether their trajectory eventually succeeded or failed.
To better assist users with completing challenging tasks, AI agents mediate communications, access data, and interact with different APIs. Many employers (and even nation-states) already provide their users with this technology.
A practical walkthrough using text-to-SQL as the example The post Why I Stopped Using One Agent and Built a Multi-Agent Pipeline Instead appeared first on Towards Data Science .
By Priyansh Bhardwaj
Diffusion models have shown strong potential for multi-modal planning in end-to-end autonomous driving. However, most existing methods confine diffusion to the planning module, conditioning on fixed outputs from separate discriminative perception networks.
Evaluating LLM agents requires dynamic environments that go beyond static reasoning and zero-sum games. Real-world economic interaction is often open-ended and mixed-motive: agents must negotiate, create positive-sum surplus, compete for scarce assets, and plan under delayed returns.
Tool Calling and Structured Output are two core capabilities of modern Agent systems, yet their interaction under joint deployment conditions remains insufficiently understood. This paper reports a reproducible phenomenon observed in a production Agent system: when Tool Calling and JSON Schema constraints are simultaneously enabled, multiple open-weight models cease invoking tools despite maintaining high schema compliance.
Recent studies on world modeling for Large Language Model (LLM) agents typically formulate the learning objective as next-observation prediction. However, this objective ties supervision to what a transition happens to reveal, which may omit the dynamics most relevant to the agent's current decision.
Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and brain signal understanding are pivotal for clinical health and next-generation interactions. Despite this significance, its widespread adoption in real-world scenarios remains restricted, primarily because current analytical paradigms lack sufficient agentic intelligence.
Runtime assurance (RTA) protects a safety-critical system by switching from an advanced controller to a verified safe controller when a monitored condition is violated. The standard latching rule, which trips on the first breach of the safe set and then coasts, is correct for a diverging controller but pathological for a capable online-adapting one.
arXiv:2606. 24437v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Agents (MoA) architectures improve inference-time scaling by organizing multiple LLM agents into layered reasoning pipelines.
By Heng Ping, Arijit Bhattacharjee, Peiyu Zhang, Shixuan Li, Wei Yang, Ali Jannesari, Nesreen Ahmed, Paul Bogdan
arXiv:2606. 24429v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI coding agents are entering the open-source supply chain, yet their diverse and often invisible traces leave their prevalence poorly understood.
By Arsham Khosravani, Audris Mockus
arXiv:2606. 24026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability has made substantial progress in automatically localizing circuits, but explaining what localized components do remains labor-intensive and difficult to standardize.
By Ayan Antik Khan, Harsh Kohli, Yuekun Yao, Huan Sun, Ziyu Yao
arXiv:2606. 24453v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern coding agents pair LLM generators with various tools, including cheap diagnostics and expensive verifiers.
By Theodore Papamarkou, Vladislav Smirnov, Viktor Mazanov, Artem Vazhentsev, Preslav Nakov, Timothy Baldwin, Artem Shelmanov
arXiv:2606. 24712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Humans effortlessly locate and identify objects by touch alone, even without vision.
By Shivani Kamtikar, Chung Hee Kim, Camilla Tabasso, Tye Brady, Joshua Migdal, Taskin Padir
arXiv:2606. 24311v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language model (LLM) agents are applied to longer tasks, they increasingly modify workspace state across multiple rounds of iteration.
By Kailong Ren, Fubo Sun, Jiachen Liu, Liu Yang, Zimo Yin, Jiaying Li, Congli Yin, Ming He, Yu Huo, Jiawei Liu, Zeping Chen, Yubin Huangfu, Ronghua Li, Yixuan Wu, Xing Su, Yanzhi Xu, Likang Wu, Hongke Zhao, Lei Zhang, Xiaohui Geng, Jianping Fan
arXiv:2605. 08245v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) increasingly power high-stakes applications, from medical imaging to autonomous systems, yet they routinely hallucinate, confidently describing content not present in the input.
By Harshvardhan Saini, Samyak Jha, Yiming Tang, Dianbo Liu
arXiv:2605. 24050v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Skill libraries allow LLM agents to load task-specific instructions on demand, letting non-expert users solve domain-specific tasks through natural language without knowing which skills exist or how they work.
By Hongwen Song, Song Wei
arXiv:2606. 24589v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scaling adversarial evaluation of large language models requires both a method for generating hard inputs and a reliable way to confirm that resulting failures are real.
By Khanak Khandelwal (Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur)
arXiv:2606. 24780v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Progress in deep learning is, at scale, more a matter of systems engineering than of modelling: the behaviour of a model in training (its throughput, its memory footprint, and the numerical fidelity of the result) is determined less by the architecture itself than by how that architecture is expressed on the hardware.
By Adhitya Charan, Adwaid Suresh, Anuj Kumar, Aparna A, Dhanakumar K, Dharun M S, Dinesh G, Goutham Kumar Reddy K, Harshini V M, Jenifa D, Jona Delcy C A, Kathirvel S, Killi Uma Maheswara Rao, Kiruthik Kanna M, Kurra Vishnu Sai, Madhumithaa G K, Navin Kumar V, Ram Charan Golla, Revathi T, Rishikkanth R, Sanjay Krishna M V, Surendra Vendra