arXiv Machine Learning By Christos Petridis, Zoran Obradovic, Mladen Kezunovic

Evaluating Large Language Models for Forced Outage Risk Prediction: Benefits and Comparison to Machine Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

This study evaluates large language models (LLMs) for predicting weather‑related forced outage risk in a distribution grid using a zero‑shot approach without labeled training data. The task is framed as binary severity classification over 3h, 6h, and 12h horizons, leveraging six years of outage records and high‑resolution weather data from central Texas. Four zero‑shot LLMs are compared to two supervised classifiers under two input settings—current weather observations and forecast data—showing that supervised models lead on macro‑F1 and precision, while newer LLMs achieve competitive scores and offer complementary strengths in reasoning and geographic scalability.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Oct 31

OutageDiT: A Foundation Model for Power Outage Forecasting and Scenario Generation

OutageDiT is a foundation model designed to generate seven‑day power‑outage trajectories at 15‑minute resolution. It uses a condition encoder to process historical context and future covariates, and a shallow flow‑matching decoder to sample complete outage trajectories, enabling point forecasting, uncertainty quantification, and conditional scenario generation. The model improves forecast accuracy and scenario quality over strong baselines and can transfer zero‑shot to held‑out regions, linking outage forecasting to operational planning under uncertainty.

By Yunqin Zhu, Feng Qiu, Yao Xie
arXiv AI
Oct 27

EvoBench: An Evolving, Diagnostic Benchmark Framework for Environmental Modeling

EvoBench is a diagnostic benchmark framework designed to reveal where and when machine‑learning models for environmental variables fail, rather than relying on a single average accuracy score. It tracks model performance over time and across spatial extrapolation, highlighting issues such as non‑stationarity, poor performance at unmonitored sites, and under‑prediction of rare events like floods. In a case study on daily streamflow prediction across 9,000 U.S. basins, EvoBench shows that no model dominates all scenarios and that targeted fixes can mitigate identified weaknesses.

By Yiming Sun, Yuan Zhang, Qi Cheng, Yingda Fan, Runlong Yu, Yiqun Xie, Xiaowei Jia
arXiv AI
Sep 3

OutageDiT: A Generative Foundation Model for Power Outage Forecasting and Scenario Simulation

OutageDiT is a generative foundation model that produces seven‑day power‑outage trajectories at quarter‑hour resolution, trained on nationwide outage and weather data. It uses a condition encoder to process historical context and future covariates, and a shallow flow decoder to generate full trajectories, enabling point forecasting, uncertainty quantification, and conditional event simulation. The model outperforms strong baselines on forecasting benchmarks and can transfer zero‑shot to unseen regions, linking outage simulation to operational planning under uncertainty.

By Yunqin Zhu, Feng Qiu, Yao Xie
arXiv AI
Oct 16

Forecast lead time and the timing of crew deployment for weather-driven power outages using AI weather models

The study evaluates how forecast lead time influences the effectiveness of outage predictions for crew deployment using AI weather models GraphCast and FourCastNet. It finds that the ability to capture outage burden decreases with longer lead times, with a notable drop between three and five days. Early deployment with all requested crews outperforms late deployment with fewer crews, and the study also examines the impact of antecedent land surface predictors and calibration of prediction intervals for tropical cyclone events.

By Mohammad Kian Golkar, Luciano Alves de Oliveira, Mohamad Alipour