The paper introduces Graph‑Agentic Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG), a system that blends structured evidence with adaptive agents capable of planning retrieval, navigating relations, verifying claims, delegating tasks, and employing tools. It highlights how defects in graph construction can propagate through retrieval and control decisions, potentially leading to significant outcomes. To address these risks, the authors propose an assurance‑by‑construction framework with five interface contracts—evidence, retrieval, reasoning, capability & delegation, and outcome—that make provenance, validity, authorization, uncertainty, and recoverability explicit, and outline an evaluation agenda for social‑good applications.
arXiv:2606. 04990v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents are evolving from passive text generators into autonomous systems capable of planning, tool use, retrieval, memory access, environmental interaction, and multi-agent collaboration.
Organizational decisions are co-created while evidence, constraints, and human priorities continue to evolve. In conventional transcript-based multi-agent systems, humans typically provide an initial problem, agents deliberate internally, and the system returns a final response.
arXiv:2608. 13046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organizational decisions are co-created while evidence, constraints, and human priorities continue to evolve.
arXiv:2606. 16603v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in data-intensive analytical tasks, yet their outputs are rarely verifiable: a reliance on linear text trajectories makes their reasoning difficult to audit.
LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks. This evolution has produced paradigms including Prompt Engineering to elicit model capabilities,...
arXiv:2608.21156v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks. This evolution has produced paradigms includi...
arXiv:2608.28642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graphs used by agentic systems are often treated as flat stores of extracted triples, with little record of who owns a fact, why it was admit...
arXiv:2607. 24563v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Security Operations Centers increasingly rely on automated mapping of Cyber Threat Intelligence reports to MITRE ATT&CK, yet extractor outputs remain fallible and are often stored without the evidence, provenance, and validation history needed to decide whether an individual mapping should be trusted.
arXiv:2608. 12761v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic workflows are commonly evaluated by whether they reach the correct outcome.
arXiv:2606. 04990v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents increasingly solve complex tasks by interacting with external tools, retrieval systems, memory modules, environments, and other agents.
Always-on agents are systems whose future behavior depends on durable state accumulated across earlier interactions. We treat them as persistent-state systems: the operative system includes retrievable memories, but also task ledgers, permissions, credentials, commitments, provenance and audit records, shared state, trigger conditions, and externally committed effects linked to those records.
The paper surveys self‑evolving agents, highlighting that their states—memories, tools, skills, workflows, and inter‑agent relations—are dynamic and can be modeled as evolving graphs. It critiques existing surveys for treating graphs merely as support structures and proposes a framework that views agent evolution as dynamic graph transformation, categorizing methods into node/feature, edge/topology, subgraph activation, and cross‑component co‑evolution. The authors further map dynamic‑graph learning subfields to agent capabilities, discuss potential failure modes, and outline graph‑aware evaluation and governance protocols to guide the design and oversight of self‑evolving agents.