arXiv:2608.21156v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks. This evolution has produced paradigms includi...
The paper surveys self‑evolving agents, highlighting that their states—memories, tools, skills, workflows, and inter‑agent relations—are dynamic and can be modeled as evolving graphs. It critiques existing surveys for treating graphs merely as support structures and proposes a framework that views agent evolution as dynamic graph transformation, categorizing methods into node/feature, edge/topology, subgraph activation, and cross‑component co‑evolution. The authors further map dynamic‑graph learning subfields to agent capabilities, discuss potential failure modes, and outline graph‑aware evaluation and governance protocols to guide the design and oversight of self‑evolving agents.
arXiv:2609.05774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multi-agent LLM systems increasingly rely on graph-structured communication to coordinate specialized agents. We revisit multi-agent orchestrati...
The paper examines when multi‑agent collaboration is beneficial versus single‑agent approaches. It finds that collaboration yields systematic advantages mainly in long‑horizon tasks with sparse dependencies, while single agents perform better in tightly coupled, sequential workflows. The authors introduce SAIGE, a lightweight multi‑agent mechanism that models collaboration as a dynamically evolving graph, and show that it balances context efficiency and task performance without always improving outcomes as more agents are added.
The paper examines when multi‑agent collaboration is truly beneficial as large language models grow more capable. It finds that multi‑agent systems yield systematic advantages mainly for long‑horizon tasks with sparse dependencies, while single‑agent approaches excel in tightly coupled, sequential workflows. The authors introduce SAIGE, a lightweight, graph‑based collaboration framework that balances context efficiency and performance, demonstrating that adding more agents or deeper recursion does not always improve outcomes.
arXiv:2607. 23678v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) enable autonomous agents for reasoning, planning, and tool use.
arXiv:2609.39777v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems coordinate specialized reasoning through aggregation, interaction, and adaptive control, yet their potential for graph le...
arXiv:2607. 28629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid transition from reactive large language models (LLMs) to persistent, action-capable systems has exposed critical gaps in the architectural understanding of Agentic AI, particularly in separating inference, orchestration, and execution layers for autonomous AI agents.
arXiv:2606. 16328v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable potential in dynamic graph reasoning, but suffer from a scaling bottleneck: current models can only handle graphs with tens of nodes, constrained by exponential reasoning overhead and finite context windows.
arXiv:2608. 10504v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As coding agents increasingly handle implementation, the central challenge shifts from building individual agents to building an infrastructure that systematically improves them.
arXiv:2604. 17708v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Automating operations research (OR) with large language models (LLMs) remains limited by hand-crafted reasoning--execution workflows.
The paper introduces DHCG, a framework that dynamically constructs hierarchical collaboration graphs for large language model–based multi‑agent systems. DHCG coordinates Planner, Worker, and Generator modules to adaptively determine the composition and scale of agents during execution, guided by feedback and action‑aware preference optimization. Experiments on code generation, mathematical reasoning, and domain‑specific tasks show DHCG surpasses static and dynamic baselines, improving performance by 2.77–8.02 points and achieving a 13.06‑point gain over single‑agent baselines.