arXiv AI
Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligence
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 21
Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligence
LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks. This evolution has produced paradigms including Prompt Engineering to elicit model capabilities,...
arXiv AI
Aug 20
Self-Evolving Agents as Dynamic Graph Transformation: A Survey and New Perspective
The paper surveys self‑evolving agents, highlighting that their states—memories, tools, skills, workflows, and inter‑agent relations—are dynamic and can be modeled as evolving graphs. It critiques existing surveys for treating graphs merely as support structures and proposes a framework that views agent evolution as dynamic graph transformation, categorizing methods into node/feature, edge/topology, subgraph activation, and cross‑component co‑evolution. The authors further map dynamic‑graph learning subfields to agent capabilities, discuss potential failure modes, and outline graph‑aware evaluation and governance protocols to guide the design and oversight of self‑evolving agents.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
arXiv:2609.05774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multi-agent LLM systems increasingly rely on graph-structured communication to coordinate specialized agents. We revisit multi-agent orchestrati...
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Focus Is All You Need: Adaptive Goal-aware Attention Orchestration for Multi-Agent Graph Systems
arXiv:2607. 23678v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) enable autonomous agents for reasoning, planning, and tool use.
arXiv AI
Sep 18
Rethinking Multi-Agent Collaboration: When More Is Less
The paper examines when multi‑agent collaboration is beneficial versus single‑agent approaches. It finds that collaboration yields systematic advantages mainly in long‑horizon tasks with sparse dependencies, while single agents perform better in tightly coupled, sequential workflows. The authors introduce SAIGE, a lightweight multi‑agent mechanism that models collaboration as a dynamically evolving graph, and show that it balances context efficiency and task performance without always improving outcomes as more agents are added.
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 2
GraphMAS: A Systematic Benchmark of Multi-Agent Coordination for Graph Learning
arXiv:2609.39777v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems coordinate specialized reasoning through aggregation, interaction, and adaptive control, yet their potential for graph le...