arXiv AI By Pranav Bykampadi, Neel Mokaria, Vishesh Narayan, Faizan Wajid, Ashok Agrawala

From Extraction to Governed Memory: Multi-Agent Knowledge Graph Construction with Domain-Expert Review

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 12

Agents-K1: Towards Agent-native Knowledge Orchestration

arXiv:2606. 13669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current LLM-based research agents have advanced through agent orchestration, yet largely overlook scientific knowledge orchestration.

By Zongsheng Cao, Bihao Zhan, Jinxin Shi, Jiong Wang, Fangchen Yu, Zhijie Zhong, Zijie Guo, Tianshuo Peng, Zhuo Liu, Yi Xie, Xiang Zhuang, Yue Fan, Runmin Ma, Shiyang Feng, Xiangchao Yan, Anran Liu, Peng Ye, Wenlong Zhang, Shufei Zhang, Chunfeng Song, Fenghua Ling, Jie Zhou, Liang He, Bo Zhang, Lei Bai
arXiv AI
Oct 26

Ontology-Guided Knowledge Graph Construction from Structured Metadata and Climate Science Publications

The paper presents an ontology‑guided framework that uses specialized agents and large language models to extract, verify, and link factual triples from scientific publications, ensuring semantic consistency and traceability. Applied to 2,000 climate science papers, the system produced an ontology‑grounded knowledge graph with 133,990 nodes and 755,308 relations, achieving high agreement with human annotators and a 98.96% correctness rate among validated triples. The pipeline and resulting graph are publicly released for community use.

By Aayush Acharya, Qi Zhang, Eduard Dragut, Longin Jan Latecki
arXiv AI
Oct 31

What Does an Ontology Catch? Curated, LLM-Generated and Data-Derived Ontologies as Checkers of LLM Agents over Knowledge Graphs

The paper investigates how different types of ontologies—curated, LLM-generated, and data-derived—serve as checkers for large language model agents answering questions over knowledge graphs. By evaluating these ontologies as prompt context, as checkers, or both, across both open-weight and proprietary agents on public and a large private graph, the study quantifies the trade-offs between errors caught and false alarms. It finds that curated ontologies can flag more correct answers than other sources but are only marginally more precise than random, and that combining sources or providing specific feedback offers limited benefits.

By Michal Orzechowski, Rund Tawfiq, Tomasz Kosciolek