arXiv Computation and Language

SYN-DIGITS: A Synthetic Control Framework for Calibrated Digital Twin Simulation

SYN-DIGITS is a model‑agnostic, post‑hoc calibration framework that uses relationships learned from digital twin simulations to predict human responses, especially in cold‑start scenarios where no target question data is available. It transfers these relationships to improve individual‑level correlation and distributional predictions, even when only marginal reference data is available. Experiments on three datasets and thirteen persona constructions show significant gains—up to 417% improvement in correlation and 57% reduction in distributional error—over uncalibrated baselines.

arXiv AI
Sep 15

Synthetic Data in Marketing Research: How to Evaluate and When to Trust

The paper discusses the use of synthetic data in marketing research, arguing that the key question is not whether synthetic respondents work, but when they do. It categorizes synthetic data into three types—ungrounded LLM responses, segment-level personas, and individual-level digital twins—and maps each to the decisions they can support. The authors also propose a taxonomy of accuracy measures, highlight the forgotten question problem, and introduce an ex‑ante answerability diagnostic based on R² to improve twin-human correlation.

By Oded Netzer, Rajan Sambandam
arXiv AI
Sep 25

AI-Moderated Interviews for Market Research and Digital Twins Calibration

AI‑moderated interviews are a scalable market‑research method that can match human moderation in depth, cover more themes, and recover more customer needs while keeping budgets constant. Participants, however, feel more emotionally engaged with live humans. Digital twins built from AI‑moderated data predict consumer responses better than demographics‑only personas, but the added richness does not improve quantitative predictions over static interviews, and prediction errors stem from differences in thinking styles and data‑distribution gaps.

By Yuting Deng, Jingxuan Liu, Olivier Toubia, Naman Jain
arXiv AI
Jun 4

Synthetic Personalities: How Well Can LLMs Mimic Individual Respondents Using Socio-Economic Microdata?

arXiv:2606. 04592v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based digital twins promise to scale and accelerate market research, but most published twins are either coarse persona bots conditioned on a few demographic questions or detailed individual-level twins built on purpose-collected surveys and interview transcripts.

By Leonard Kinzinger, Jochen Hartmann
arXiv AI
Jun 18

How Well Do Large Language Models Capture Human Personality?

arXiv:2606. 18263v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human populations via persona prompting, often under the assumptions that richer persona descriptions improve behavioral fidelity, similarly sized attribute combinations are equally simulatable, and persona definitions generalize across tasks.

By Aanisha Bhattacharyya, Yaman Kumar Singla, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Changyou Chen, Jitendra Ajmera
arXiv AI
Aug 5

Emulate or Estimate? The Divergent Strengths of Base and Post-Trained Language Models for Opinion Simulation

arXiv:2608. 03044v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to simulate human opinions, but prior work reports conflicting results: some studies find promising alignment with human survey data, while others find persona collapse and weak demographic sensitivity.

By Seth Grief-Albert, Jessica Bo, Difan Jiao, Ashton Anderson