arXiv AI By Leonard Kinzinger, Jochen Hartmann

Synthetic Personalities: How Well Can LLMs Mimic Individual Respondents Using Socio-Economic Microdata?

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 04592v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based digital twins promise to scale and accelerate market research, but most published twins are either coarse persona bots conditioned on a few demographic questions or detailed individual-level twins built on purpose-collected surveys and interview transcripts.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 15

Synthetic Data in Marketing Research: How to Evaluate and When to Trust

The paper discusses the use of synthetic data in marketing research, arguing that the key question is not whether synthetic respondents work, but when they do. It categorizes synthetic data into three types—ungrounded LLM responses, segment-level personas, and individual-level digital twins—and maps each to the decisions they can support. The authors also propose a taxonomy of accuracy measures, highlight the forgotten question problem, and introduce an ex‑ante answerability diagnostic based on R² to improve twin-human correlation.

By Oded Netzer, Rajan Sambandam
arXiv AI
Sep 25

AI-Moderated Interviews for Market Research and Digital Twins Calibration

AI‑moderated interviews are a scalable market‑research method that can match human moderation in depth, cover more themes, and recover more customer needs while keeping budgets constant. Participants, however, feel more emotionally engaged with live humans. Digital twins built from AI‑moderated data predict consumer responses better than demographics‑only personas, but the added richness does not improve quantitative predictions over static interviews, and prediction errors stem from differences in thinking styles and data‑distribution gaps.

By Yuting Deng, Jingxuan Liu, Olivier Toubia, Naman Jain