arXiv:2606. 04592v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based digital twins promise to scale and accelerate market research, but most published twins are either coarse persona bots conditioned on a few demographic questions or detailed individual-level twins built on purpose-collected surveys and interview transcripts.
By Leonard Kinzinger, Jochen Hartmann
The paper discusses the use of synthetic data in marketing research, arguing that the key question is not whether synthetic respondents work, but when they do. It categorizes synthetic data into three types—ungrounded LLM responses, segment-level personas, and individual-level digital twins—and maps each to the decisions they can support. The authors also propose a taxonomy of accuracy measures, highlight the forgotten question problem, and introduce an ex‑ante answerability diagnostic based on R² to improve twin-human correlation.
By Oded Netzer, Rajan Sambandam
arXiv:2609.07987v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM-based digital twins promise to reduce repeated human data collection by generating person- specific responses, yet existing evaluations provide lit...
By Steven Wang, Kyle Hunt, Shaojie Tang, Kenneth Joseph
arXiv:2603. 00059v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: How well can AI-derived synthetic research data replicate the responses of human participants?
By Jason Miklian, Kristian Hoelscher, John E. Katsos
arXiv:2601. 14264v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) act as digital twins for human respondents, yet their psychometric comparability remains uncertain.
By Yufei Zhang, Zhihao Ma
arXiv:2608.20344v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM-based "digital twins" aim to simulate how an individual would behavein new environments or respond to novel questions, given some representation of...
By Iris Ye, Tianze Deng, Ozan Candogan