arXiv:2605. 13909v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Negotiation is a central mechanism of economic exchange, shaping markets, procurement, labor agreements, and resource allocation.
arXiv:2608. 06549v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs are increasingly being applied to tasks involving institutional and political texts, but existing benchmarks evaluate them on isolated documents or single tasks.
arXiv:2607. 05863v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Negotiation is a fundamental strategic interaction in management science, characterized by agents attempting to reach agreements while protecting private information, such as reservation costs and hidden valuations.
The paper investigates whether large language models can extend their agentic capabilities to goal pursuit in open-ended multi-turn dialogue. It introduces Tool-Mediated Interaction (TMI), a training-free protocol that frames dialogue actions as tool calls and responses as tool results, preserving a continuous reasoning–action–observation loop. Across social interaction, emotional support, persuasion, and price negotiation tasks, TMI improves goal attainment, preference, donation amounts, and negotiation margins while reducing reasoning tokens and cross-turn phrase reuse.
The study investigates how large language models (LLMs) perform in a double auction market, a common economic mechanism. By replacing human participants with LLM agents, the authors find that markets with LLMs converge more slowly or not at all, leading to less efficient resource allocations. Analysis of trading decisions reveals significant variation across model families and roles, and a lexical study of Chain-of-Thought traces links trade execution to a shift from strategic thinking to urgency.
The paper examines how large language model (LLM) agents can use trust estimates in repeated multi‑party, multi‑issue negotiations where one participant covertly tries to block agreement. By introducing a framework where agents maintain pairwise trust scores across successive games, the study compares trust‑aware and trust‑agnostic agents. Results show a trust–agreement gap: while trust‑aware agents quickly spot the adversary and trust can raise agreement rates by up to 23 percentage points, this benefit only materializes when agents are explicitly guided to incorporate trust into their decision‑making.
arXiv:2607. 28956v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model agents are increasingly evaluated as autonomous tool users, yet most benchmarks focus on bounded tasks with immediate success criteria.
arXiv:2608. 06735v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved strong results in improving large language models (LLMs) on tasks with stationary, verifiable rewards, such as mathematical reasoning and code execution.
arXiv:2606. 27136v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For LLM agents in multi-step interactive environments, a key challenge is to make effective use of accumulated interaction experience.
arXiv:2606. 08340v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, they must coordinate with others over long horizons in open-ended interactive tasks.
arXiv:2601. 04387v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Negotiation is a core component of social intelligence, requiring agents to balance strategic reasoning, cooperation, and social norms.
arXiv:2607. 02255v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory for a long-horizon LLM agent is a contract about what each future decision is allowed to see.