Hugging Face Trending Papers

FaultGene: LLM-Assisted Fault-Augmented Test Generation for Hardware-in-the-Loop Validation of Autonomous Driving Systems

arXiv AI
Oct 23

FaultGene: LLM-Assisted Fault-Augmented Test Generation for Hardware-in-the-Loop Validation of Autonomous Driving Systems

FaultGene is an LLM-assisted framework that automatically generates executable fault‑augmented tests for hardware‑in‑the‑loop validation of autonomous driving systems. It takes a baseline Scenic/CARLA scenario and a structured fault specification, then produces fault‑augmented test cases that reflect HIL‑level fault injection effects. The system refines candidates offline using semantic‑consistency checks and execution‑level feedback, enabling high‑quality test generation at deployment time without manual engineering or repeated refinement loops.

By Chaoran Yuan, Fadi Kurdahi
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Coverage-Driven RTL Assertion Generation with Formal Exploration and Neuro-Symbolic Refinement

The paper introduces NeuroAssertion, a coverage-driven framework for generating RTL assertions that integrates formal trace generation, syntax-guided synthesis, and a two-step large language model (LLM) refinement process. It transforms hard-to-reach control-flow conditions into formal reachability goals, uses model checking to produce diverse traces, and mines initial assertions via SyGuS. The refinement stage employs one LLM to propose candidate assertions for uncovered regions and a second LLM to generate repair grammars that guide symbolic synthesis, resulting in roughly twice as many assertions and higher mutation coverage compared to traditional methods.

By Zhiyuan Yan, Ziyue Zheng, Hongce Zhang
arXiv AI
Jun 19

Library-Aware Doubles and Iterative Repair for Large Language Model-Generated Unit Tests in OpenSIL Firmware

arXiv:2606. 19725v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Validating changes in low-level C firmware is expensive because unit tests (UTs) are fragile under strict build constraints, where missing headers, unresolved symbols, and dependency mismatches frequently prevent compilation and linking.

By Ma Toan Bach, Yuchi Zheng, Haingo Razafindranto, Tanvir Alam, Aric Leather, Ranveer Sandhu, Jitesh Arora
arXiv AI
Oct 9

A Survey on LLM-Integrated Hardware Design Verification

The paper surveys how large language models (LLMs) are being used in hardware verification, covering tasks such as assertion generation, testbench creation, bug localization, and formal reasoning. It categorizes the literature by methodology, verification goal, tool interaction, benchmarks, and evaluation metrics, and distinguishes between inference-time techniques (prompting, retrieval, structured reasoning, agentic workflows) and training-time adaptation. The authors highlight that LLMs excel as semantic reasoning, search, and orchestration components within verification workflows, yet emphasize the need for semantic alignment, scalable integration, generalization, and rigorous evaluation to ensure true verification correctness.

By Hao Zheng, Jaime Rafael Imperial, Bardia Nadimi, Xiangfei Kong
arXiv AI
Sep 18

A Simulation Platform for AUV Fault Recovery: Exploring LLM-Based Diagnostic Strategies

The paper introduces SPAR, a closed‑loop simulation platform that couples real‑time AUV control software with a higher‑level orchestration layer for fault injection, prompting, and evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in diagnosing and recovering from anomalies. SPAR enables ensemble testing of LLMs, comparing a frontier model with three locally deployable LLMs on a mass‑shift fault scenario across 480 trials, revealing that model choice significantly affects diagnostic accuracy. The study demonstrates that while the frontier model consistently ranks the correct fault mechanism among its top hypotheses, local models succeed mainly when they follow the full diagnostic procedure, and overall diagnosis and operational decisions appear decoupled in this dataset.

By Khalid Halba, Kylie Cooper, James G. Bellingham