arXiv:2610.04945v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Destructive single-cell measurements provide unpaired population snapshots rather than observations of the same cells across conditions. Loca...
By Bowen Han, Lingbei Meng, Shihuan Luo, Yupeng Zang, Wenlin LI, Peize He, Yaodi Luo, Lian Zhang, Jianqing Zhu, Jinchao Xu
The paper introduces Distribution‑Conditioned Transport (DCT), a framework that learns transport maps conditioned on embeddings of source and target distributions, allowing generalization to unseen distribution pairs. DCT supports semi‑supervised learning for distributional forecasting by leveraging distributions observed at only one condition. It is agnostic to the transport mechanism and is demonstrated on synthetic benchmarks and four biological applications, including batch effect transfer in single‑cell genomics and modeling T‑cell receptor sequence evolution.
By Nic Fishman, Gokul Gowri, Paolo L. B. Fischer, Marinka Zitnik, Omar Abudayyeh, Jonathan Gootenberg
arXiv:2608. 15783v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In transfer-learning settings, a model derived from abundant surrogate labels may be deployed in a target population where gold-standard outcomes are unobserved.
By Longtian Shi, Molei Liu, Doudou Zhou
arXiv:2610.07048v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We study errors-in-variables problems in which a target study contains only a single error-prone surrogate of an unobserved exposure, while an extern...
By Huali Zhao, Molei Liu, Tianying Wang
arXiv:2608. 19383v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Average dose-response functions are widely used to summarize causal effects of continuous treatments, but most existing methods assume that the observed sample represents the target population.
By Jay Jojo Cheng, Guanhua Chen
The paper introduces a new estimand for conditional distributional treatment effects that captures how treatments influence the entire outcome distribution, including variance and tail risks, in a covariate-dependent manner. It presents a doubly robust estimator that is minimax optimal locally and uses it to construct a test for global homogeneity of conditional potential outcome distributions. The test accommodates discrepancies beyond the maximum mean discrepancy, guarantees valid type‑1 error, is consistent against fixed alternatives, and includes a computationally efficient, permutation‑free algorithm with exact closed‑form expressions for two natural discrepancies.
By Saksham Jain, Alex Luedtke
arXiv:2608. 00701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reweighting source samples to match a target covariate distribution is a standard response to distribution shift when generalizing evidence from one population to another.
By Ying Jin, Ying Jin, Dominik Rothenh\"ausler
arXiv:2509. 09371v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) protects statistical learning against distributional shifts by optimizing the worst-case performance over a set of perturbed distributions.
By Zitao Wang, Nian Si, Molei Liu
arXiv:2605. 24212v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deploying clinical prediction models across healthcare systems often fails when key training covariates are unavailable at deployment and labeled outcomes are limited in the target domain.
By Siqi Li, Chuan Hong, Ziye Tian, Benjamin Sieu-Hon Leong, Koshi Nakagawa, Hideharu Tanaka, Sang Do Shin, Khuong Quoc Dai, Do Ngoc Son, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Nan Liu, Molei Liu
The paper introduces Risk-Set Transported Synthetic Control with Difference-in-Differences Adjustment (RT‑SC‑DiD), a method for staggered treatment‑adoption studies that keeps the donor pool fixed by reallocating weights from exiting donors to similar surviving donors while applying a DiD baseline correction. It analyzes distortion from horizon‑by‑horizon re‑optimization, derives bounds on error propagation, and proposes diagnostics and a donor‑only placebo for tuning the transport penalty. Empirical simulations show that intermediate transport regularization reduces average RMSE compared to independent horizon‑specific estimation and strong anchoring, supporting the method’s bias‑variance trade‑off.
"whyItMatters":"The method offers a principled way to stabilize synthetic‑control weights over time in staggered designs, potentially improving causal inference when donor support contracts as treatments roll out."
By Mojtaba Eslami
arXiv:2609.36911v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In this thesis I develop methods for statistical inference when the distributions arising from complex biological systems are multi-modal, geometricall...
By Oskar Kviman
GeoDose-CP introduces a graph‑local conformal inference framework for estimating localized stochastic potential outcomes when dealing with continuous or mixed continuous‑atomic treatments in Earth observation data. The method jointly models intervention‑induced treatment shifts, outcome‑scale Jacobians, and spatial residual dependence, and includes exact weighted candidate inversion, a scalable sparse approximation, and a refusal mechanism for inadequate support. Evaluation on controlled experiments, MineDoseBench, and a multi‑mine study in New South Wales demonstrates high selective coverage and identifies limitations when longitudinal treatment data are unavailable.
By Md Khalid Hasan Sakib, Dristi Datta, Manoranjan Paul, Davina White