arXiv:2607. 09982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electronic health record (EHR) data are inherently multimodal, and leveraging multiple modalities can improve predictive performance.
By Nikkie Hooman, Zhongjie Wu, Eric C. Larson, Mehak Gupta
Recently, there has been rise in multimodal vision-language models for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), yet their application in breast diagnosis, particularly for predicting biopsy outcomes remains li...
arXiv:2605. 22547v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Medical image diagnosis has achieved significant progress with deep learning, yet existing methods often rely on isolated visual evidence and lack the ability to effectively leverage similar cases and external knowledge.
By Yiming Xu, Yixuan Liu, Yuhang Zhang, Ling Zheng, Yihan Wang, Qi Song
The paper introduces MedCertAIn, a framework that uses data‑driven priors to enhance uncertainty estimation in multimodal clinical models. By integrating cross‑modal similarity and modality‑specific corruptions into neural network priors, the authors improve predictive performance and selective prediction for in‑hospital mortality risk using MIMIC‑IV and MIMIC‑CXR data. The results demonstrate competitive accuracy and notable gains over deterministic and stochastic baselines, underscoring the potential of such priors for reliable, uncertainty‑aware clinical decision support.
By L. Juli\'an Lechuga L\'opez, Tim G. J. Rudner, Farah E. Shamout
arXiv:2610.35704v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recently, there has been rise in multimodal vision-language models for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), yet their application in breast diagnosis, parti...
By Sadam Hussain, Mansoor Ali, Daly Betzabeth Avenda\~no-Avalos, Jose Gerardo Tamez-Pe\~na
arXiv:2403. 14926v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Electronic health record (EHR) systems capture a wealth of multimodal clinical data, encompassing both structured clinical codes and unstructured clinical notes.
By Tianxi Cai, Feiqing Huang, Ryumei Nakada, Linjun Zhang, Doudou Zhou
arXiv:2607. 25933v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Clinical diagnostic evaluation should not only assess whether models can provide correct diagnoses, but also reflect the realities of clinical practice, including progressive disclosure of multimodal information, dynamic updating of diagnostic hypotheses, and continuous refinement of clinical reasoning.
By Rui Yang, Weihao Xuan, Yi Lin, Zhuhan Bao, Jonathan Chong Kai Liew, Matthew Yu Heng Wong, Nicol\'as Lescano, Nikita R. Paripati, Emily Ling-Lin Pai, Jiarui Liu, Heli Qi, Heng-Jui Chang, Benny Kai Guo Loo, Huitao Li, Kunyu Yu, Yufan Wang, Chuan Hong, Shijian Lu, Douglas Teodoro, Naoto Yokoya, Ross Koppel, Mona Diab, Hua Xu, David W. Bates, Nan Liu, Yifan Peng
arXiv:2608. 02692v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Access to holistic, multimodal data improves the performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical classification tasks compared to utilizing single modalities or data sources.
By Julia Gehrmann, Lars Quakulinski, Hamza Naseem, Oya Beyan
arXiv:2604. 16878v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Early prediction of severe clinical deterioration and remaining length of stay can enable timely intervention and better resource allocation in high-acuity settings such as the ICU.
By Zhongyuan Liang, Junhyung Jo, Hyang-Jung Lee, Sang Kyu Kim, Irene Y. Chen
arXiv:2205. 04599v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is essential for trustworthy AI in healthcare, yet many existing methods rely on technical explanations that are difficult for clinicians and patients to interpret.
By Mohammad Eslami, Solale Tabarestani, Saber Kazeminasab, Ehsan Adeli, Glyn Elwyn, Tobias Elze, Mengyu Wang, Nazlee Zebardast, Lucia Sobrin, Nassir Navab, Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Malek Adjouadi
arXiv:2501. 16106v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in multimodal depression recognition for clinical interviews (MDRC) have demonstrated the potential of AI systems by integrating textual, acoustic, and facial cues.
By Wenjie Zheng, Qiming Xie, Jianfei Yu, Yang Wang, Lei Cao, Fei Wang, Shijin Wang, Rui Xia, Chengqing Zong
The paper introduces a comparative explainability framework for auditing DeBERTa‑v3 in zero‑shot medical abstract classification. It evaluates five explanation methods—SHAP, LIME, occlusion, Input × Gradient, and Attention × Gradient—using a natural language inference engine on a balanced corpus of 1,000 abstracts per diagnostic category. The study finds that explanatory stability aligns with predictive certainty, identifies three systemic failure mechanisms, and recommends combining multiple explanation methods and quantitative agreement metrics for transformer‑based medical text classifiers.
By Javier Diaz Esteban-Herreros, David Mu\~noz-Valero, Raquel Mart\'inez-Espa\~na, Jose M. Juarez, Juan Moreno-Garcia