arXiv:2608. 10505v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated radiology report generation is advancing rapidly in response to the shortage of radiologists, yet unlike a perception model, existing generation models offer no control over the sensitivity-specificity trade-off of their diagnostic content.
By Ying Jin, Noel C. F. Codella, John Corring, Mu Wei, Dinei Florencio, Eric Horvitz
arXiv:2609.01470v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly used to draft radiology reports, reliably evaluating their clinical quality remains a critical challenge. Large language...
By Charles Corbi\`ere, L\'eo Machado, Aubin Charley, Baptiste Callard, Pierre Manceron, Corentin Dancette
arXiv:2609.22281v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Foundation models have recently demonstrated strong capabilities across a wide range of medical imaging tasks. However, their performance in structured...
By Benjamin Renoust, Pierre Baudot, Tiffany Foriel, Yousra Haddou, Charles Voyton, Pierre-Henri Siot, Ezequiel Geremia, Danny Francis, Jean-Christophe Brisset, Val\'erie Bourd\`es, Sylvain Bodard, Benoit Huet
The paper introduces ConRad, a reinforcement learning framework that fine‑tunes large vision‑language models to generate calibrated verbalized confidence estimates for radiology reports. ConRad offers both a single report‑level confidence score and a sentence‑level variant, trained with the GRPO algorithm and logarithmic scoring rewards to encourage truthful self‑assessment. Experiments show significant calibration improvements over existing methods, and clinical evaluation indicates that report‑level scores align well with clinicians’ judgments, enabling targeted review of low‑confidence statements.
By David Bani-Harouni, Chantal Pellegrini, Julian L\"uers, Su Hwan Kim, Markus Baalmann, Benedikt Wiestler, Rickmer Braren, Nassir Navab, Matthias Keicher
arXiv:2607. 05880v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Imaging demand is growing faster than the radiology workforce can expand, and reporting backlogs cannot be resolved through training and recruitment alone.
By Suneeta Mall, Vladimir Nekrasov, Ashnil Kumar, Sajith Karunasena, Aiden Nibali, Alix Bird, Mateo Diaz Shine, Jarrel Seah
Med-AR introduces two autoregressive vision‑language models, Med‑AR‑8B and Med‑AR‑2B, pretrained on structured radiology reports, abnormality‑focused text, and region annotations to address long‑tailed chest X‑ray classification. The models outperform existing contrastive, self‑supervised, and supervised encoders—including Med‑CLIP, CheXFound, EVA‑Base, ARK, and BioViL‑T—across PadChest, MIMIC‑CXR, and CheXpert, achieving higher mean AUROC and AUPRC for head, medium, and tail findings and lower excess area under the risk‑coverage curve. Med‑AR also demonstrates improved selective‑prediction performance, with Med‑AR‑8B raising tail‑label mean AUPRC on MIMIC‑CXR from 0.1033 to 0.1441 and Med‑AR‑2B delivering the strongest discrimination on PadChest.
By Janhavi Prabhu, Sahil, Akshay V, Shivam Shukla, Manoj Tadepalli, Preetham Putha
arXiv:2606. 08769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic evaluation is critical for high-stakes text generation, where errors often involve omitted findings, hallucinated content, polarity reversals, location changes, uncertainty mismatches, and temporal-comparison errors rather than low surface similarity alone.
By Weixin Liu, Juming Xiong, Yang Li, Qingyuan Song, Susannah Rose, Murat Kantarcioglu, Bradley Malin, Zhijun Yin
arXiv:2607. 05628v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate and efficient classification of thoracic diseases in chest X-ray (CXR) images is crucial for timely diagnosis and treatment.
By Mohammad S. Majdi, Jeffrey J. Rodriguez
The study examines how differences in radiologists’ reporting styles—such as terminology, shorthand, formatting, and detail—affect the evaluation of AI-generated chest X‑ray reports. By quantifying the sensitivity of common metrics to these variations, the authors show that changes in reference reports can shift model rankings. They introduce a taxonomy of reporting variations and a rewriting method, ReRef, that preserves clinical meaning while altering style, and release a validated dataset of paired reference reports to aid future research.
By Daniel P. Jeong, Charles Q. Li, Hossein Hosseiny, Nitya M. Bhalla, Fatma Uyar Morency, Pradeep Ravikumar, Zachary C. Lipton, Michael Oberst
arXiv:2609.26578v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Accurate preoperative subtype classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from contrast-enhanced CT remains clinically challenging because clear cell...
By Yuan Liang, Fangyijie Wang, Kathleen M. Curran, Gu\'enol\'e Silvestre, Sourav Bhattacharjee, Abraham Campbell
arXiv:2605.30984v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Modern 3D medical vision-language models (VLMs) can generate fluent radiology-style text while exhibit critically low pathology detection and...
By Tom Maye-Lasserre, Yitong Li, Bailiang Jian, Morteza Ghahremani, Benedikt Wiestler, Christian Wachinger
arXiv:2606. 17062v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Radiology report evaluation must distinguish clinical compatibility from surface similarity, because negation, laterality, or normal-abnormal polarity can reverse a finding.
By Zhenhong Yang, Zhuoyun Liu, Jintao Fei, Wen Tang, Shichao Quan, Jun Zhao, Jun Xu