arXiv:2607. 12075v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background: Deep learning models can classify thyroid nodules on ultrasound, but reliable clinical decision support also requires calibrated probabilities, uncertainty estimation, and selective referral, particularly under dataset shift.
By Md. Sadibul Hasan Sadib, Md. Mohayminul Mukit, Rahmatul Kabir Rasel Sarker, Tahmid Alam Tamim, Md. Monir Hossain Shimul
arXiv:2608. 12590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Thyroid ultrasound diagnosis requires coordinated lesion localization, measurement, risk stratification and reporting, yet most AI systems address these tasks in isolation and provide limited support for clinical review.
By Haifan Gong, Shiyu Chen, Bodong Wang, Yuqi Wang, Shijie Wang, Guoliang You, Xinyu Xiong, Haowei Wang, Mingzhi Mao, Dexing Kong, Qinghua Liu, Wei Lou, Fei Chen, Guanbin Li
arXiv:2608. 03079v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Breast core needle biopsy (CNB) is central to breast cancer diagnosis yet remains challenging because limited tissue sampling, lesion heterogeneity, and subtle morphologic overlap can obscure subtype distinctions.
By Ting Yin, Danning Li, Chen Shu, Xiaoxia Yao, Boyu Fu, Yujing Chang, Tianyu Shi, Mengna Feng, Jie Chen, Jing Fu, Xiuli Xiao, Tianlin Li, Mumin Shao, Jiaxin Bi, Wenchuan Zhang, Xiaoyan Wu, Xiao Han, Zhang Zhang, Yuhao Yi, Hong Bu
arXiv:2609.26578v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Accurate preoperative subtype classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from contrast-enhanced CT remains clinically challenging because clear cell...
By Yuan Liang, Fangyijie Wang, Kathleen M. Curran, Gu\'enol\'e Silvestre, Sourav Bhattacharjee, Abraham Campbell
arXiv:2608. 13939v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for assessing thyroid nodules, and the ACR TI-RADS framework standardizes diagnosis through five ultrasound feature categories that are aggregated into five risk levels (TR1-TR5).
By Bingxin Yu, Xueli Wang, Jerry Zhou, Wenyan Wang, Li Wen, Lan Huang, Xin Feng, Fengfeng Zhou, Kewei Li
MagViT is an interpretable multi‑magnification transformer that classifies breast histopathology images by extracting representations from four BreakHis magnifications (40X, 100X, 200X, 400X) and fusing them with a learnable, scale‑gated mechanism that can mask missing scales. The model selects the most accurate architectural branch at the patient level using five‑fold cross‑validation, achieving high performance on BreakHis (mean image accuracy 0.9191, patient accuracy 0.9643, macro‑F1 0.9042) and demonstrating preliminary cross‑dataset generalization on BUSI and IDC. Grad‑CAM visualizations confirm that the network focuses on diagnostically relevant regions across magnifications.
By Nabil Ashab, Soumit Kumar Kundu, Saif Mahmud Parvez, Shahadat Hossain Sohag, Bidhan Biswas, Nazmus Subha
Automated radiology report generation is advancing rapidly in response to the shortage of radiologists, yet unlike a perception model, existing generation models offer no control over the sensitivity-specificity trade-off of their diagnostic content. Such control is essential because clinical scenarios diverge: emergency triage prioritizes sensitivity to reduce missed findings, whereas confirmatory interpretation emphasizes specificity to limit unnecessary interventions.
arXiv:2606. 06224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Explanations of multiple instance learning (MIL) models are widely used for validation and discovery in digital histopathology.
By Yanqing Luo (Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany, Machine Learning Group, Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin, Germany), Julius Hense (Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany, Machine Learning Group, Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin, Germany), Niklas Preni{\ss}l (Institute of Pathology, Charit\'e Universit\"atsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, Berlin Institute of Health at Charit\'e -- Universit\"atsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charit\'e Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany), Andreas Mock (Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Division of Translational Medical Oncology, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany, NCT Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, German Cancer Consortium), Klaus-Robert M\"uller (Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany, Machine Learning Group, Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Seoul, Korea, Max-Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbr\"ucken, Germany), Thomas Schnake (Department of Chemistry, Chemical Physics Theory Group, University of Toronto, Canada, Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada, Acceleration Consortium, University of Toronto, Canada), Mina Jamshidi Idaji (Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany, Machine Learning Group, Technische Universit\"at Berlin, Berlin, Germany)
This study evaluates the classification accuracy of six modern deep‑learning architectures—VGG19, ResNet50, GoogleNet, ConvNeXt, EfficientNet, and Vision Transformers—on breast ultrasound images categorized by BI‑RADS. Using 2,945 training images and 936 validation images from 1,540 patients, the models were tested in full fine‑tuning, linear evaluation, and training‑from‑scratch settings. The best performance was achieved with full fine‑tuning, yielding 76.39 % accuracy and a 67.94 % F1 score.
By Malitha Gunawardhana, Norbert Zolek
arXiv:2608. 04046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Survival analysis is an established framework for analyzing time-to-event data, yet many clinical machine learning studies still binarize the outcome before model training.
By Shashank Yadav, David M. Routman, Andrew Y. K. Foong
arXiv:2607. 16317v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep networks now subtype brain tumors on MRI about as well as specialist readers, yet accuracy is not what keeps them out of the clinic.
By Medhansh Sharma
arXiv:2608. 10505v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated radiology report generation is advancing rapidly in response to the shortage of radiologists, yet unlike a perception model, existing generation models offer no control over the sensitivity-specificity trade-off of their diagnostic content.
By Ying Jin, Noel C. F. Codella, John Corring, Mu Wei, Dinei Florencio, Eric Horvitz