arXiv:2607. 08745v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Vision-Language Models, Large Language Models, and Multimodal Large Language Models have improved autonomous driving tasks such as scene understanding, decision making, trajectory prediction, and visual question answering.
By Siddharth Damodharan, Radhika Gupta, Ali Alshami, Ryan Rabinowitz, Jugal Kalita
arXiv:2608. 04776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The ability to accurately assess and anticipate risks in safety-critical scenarios is crucial for autonomous driving systems.
By Yu Zhao, Jiangyu Pan, Tao Hu, Ming Yin, Fan Yang, Jiangfan Liu, Xiubo Liang
The paper introduces an automated pipeline that converts non‑critical driving scenes into safety‑critical scenarios by integrating computer vision, Large Language Models (LLMs), and Augmented Reality (AR). It detects and tracks road users, extracts safety features such as distance, velocity, motion direction, and Time‑to‑Collision (TTC), and evaluates scene criticality. Safe scenes are then modified by an LLM, which generates realistic collision‑inducing objects and behaviors that are overlaid onto the original scene using AR, achieving 97.52% safety classification accuracy on the nuScenes dataset and producing realistic scenarios like pedestrian crossings, rear overtaking vehicles, and sudden‑stop events.
By Noura Fady, Farah Khaled, Catherine M. Elias
PRISM (Proactive Risk Intelligence and Safety Management) is an agentic multi-model architecture designed to shift autonomous transportation safety from reactive crash avoidance to proactive, continuous risk management. It uses inverse crash‑probability modeling to transform binary crash classifiers into dynamic safety scores, and runs three specialized models—trajectory kinematics, environmental risk, and VRU interaction—coordinated by a reinforcement‑learning reasoning layer. Across 1,296 naturalistic driving scenarios, PRISM achieved a mean safety score of 68/100, classified 77.6% of situations as advisory, and flagged 3.8% as near‑misses, with 11% requiring intervention or emergency response, highlighting trajectory risk and VRU proximity as key safety factors.
By Joyjit Roy, Samaresh Kumar Singh, Sushanta Das
arXiv:2607. 07103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe autonomous driving requires both rapid responses to common high-risk events and deeper reasoning over rare, extreme long-tail scenarios in traffic safety.
By Heye Huang, Jingguang Li, Zhiyuan Zhou, Paul Liang, Mingyu Wu, Kitae Jang, Jianqiang Wang
The 10th AI City Challenge, held alongside ECCV 2026, celebrates a decade of benchmarking for intelligent transportation, smart cities, and physical AI. Since its 2017 inception focused on vehicle detection, classification, and tracking, the challenge has expanded into a comprehensive benchmark suite covering multi‑camera perception, multimodal reasoning, synthetic‑to‑real learning, generative forecasting, and privacy‑preserving evaluation. The 2026 edition saw 325 registered teams from 26 countries, with six main tracks—spanning multi‑camera 3D perception, transportation safety captioning and VQA, traffic anomaly reasoning, text‑based person anomaly search, generative traffic video forecasting, and cross‑city object detection—plus two out‑of‑domain leaderboards for fisheye traffic‑violation understanding and pedestrian situated‑intent VQA.
By Zheng Tang, Shuo Wang, David C. Anastasiu, Ming-Ching Chang, Anuj Sharma, Quan Kong, Munkhjargal Gochoo, Jun-Wei Hsieh, Tomasz Kornuta, Zhedong Zheng, Renran Tian, Judah Goldfeder, Fulgencio Navarro, Yuxing Wang, Yizhou Wang, Sameer Satish Pusegaonkar, Anqi Li, Nalin Dadhich, Ridham Kachhadiya, Dhanishtha Patil, Haoquan Liang, Jiajun Li, Han Zhang, Yilin Zhao, Zaid Pervaiz Bhat, Shuyu Yang, Ashutosh Kumar, Rong Wang, Rafael Martin Nieto, Peter Christiansen, Ahmed Abduljawad, Mohanrasu Shanmugam, Nadeem Shaik, Sujit Biswas, Xunlei Wu, Vidya Murali, Rama Chellappa
arXiv:2511. 14592v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) show great promise for autonomous driving, but their suitability for safety-critical scenarios is largely unexplored, raising safety concerns.
By Xianhui Meng, Yuchen Zhang, Zhijian Huang, Zheng Lu, Ziling Ji, Yandan Lin, Yaoyao Yin, Hongyuan Zhang, Wei Zhou, Guangfeng Jiang, Li Zhang, Long Chen, Hangjun Ye, Jun Liu, Xiaoshuai Hao
The paper introduces a new criticality metric specifically designed for vulnerable road users (VRUs) and a scenario‑independent prediction framework that applies to all traffic participants. The VRU‑centric metric improves pedestrian criticality classification by up to 50 %, while the prediction framework surpasses state‑of‑the‑art metrics by 275 %, achieving an F1‑score of 0.96 on the DeepAccident dataset. These advances enable more accurate, scenario‑agnostic safety assessments for autonomous driving systems.
By J\"org Gamerdinger, Victor Schwarzenberger, Philipp Schmid, Sven Teufel, Oliver Bringmann
arXiv:2607. 16582v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In high-risk environments such as disaster response, situational awareness depends not only on detecting hazards but also on communicating them clearly to human operators.
By Mohammad Eskandari, Murali Krishna Varma Indukuri, Stephanie M. Lukin, Cynthia Matuszek
arXiv:2607. 16156v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Urban intersections are among the most hazardous locations in road networks, posing significant risks to vehicles and vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists.
By Tam Bang, Hussam Abubakr, Emiliano de la Garza Villarreal, Truc Phuong Nguyen, Austin Harris, Toru Hirano, Mina Sartipi, Yunfei Xu, Hoang H. Nguyen
Safe autonomous driving requires both rapid responses to common high-risk events and deeper reasoning over rare, extreme long-tail scenarios in traffic safety. These scenarios are severely under-represented in naturalistic driving data, and existing trajectory and language-augmented datasets seldom provide high-risk event labels, semantic annotations, and verifiable safety signals.
arXiv:2603. 14841v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Road crashes remain a leading cause of preventable fatalities.
By Joyjit Roy, Samaresh Kumar Singh, Sushanta Das