arXiv:2608.29348v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Background: Patient details and acquisition metadata are important for clinical decisions, image quality control, and automated research pipelines, but...
By Jakob Wasserthal, Joshy Cyriac, Michael Bach, Kimia Mozahheb Yousefi, Minh-Son To, M\'at\'e Sik, C\'edric H\'emon, Thomas Weikert, Martin Segeroth
arXiv:2607. 25589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical-imaging AI benchmarks combine datasets, DICOM rendering, prompts, provider APIs, automated labels, statistical code, manuscripts, and repository releases.
By Mateusz Koz{\l}owski
arXiv:2607. 26333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chest X-ray (CXR) machine learning relies heavily on automated evaluation using reference standards that aim to approximate clinical judgment.
By Panagiotis Fytas, Ian Selby, Clemens Karner, Judith Babar, Simon Baker, Jake Beckford, Timothy J. Sadler, Shahab Shahipasand, Arthikkaa Thavakumar, John Li Chen, Alex Sawer, Michael Roberts, Jonathan Weir-McCall, J. H. F. Rudd, Carola-Bibiane Sch\"onlieb, Anna Korhonen, Anna Breger
arXiv:2609.00909v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reliable evaluation of automated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) report generation requires standardized multicentre benchmarks and cli...
By Zhiyu Ye, Yue Sun, Limiao Zou, Cheng Xu, Keting Xu, Tong Hu, Yue Yu, Hairong Zheng, Yining Wang, Tong Zhang
arXiv:2608. 07857v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models provide transferable CT representations, but predictions based directly on these embeddings are difficult to interpret.
By Fakrul Islam Tushar, Stephen Adamo, Geoffrey D. Rubin
arXiv:2608.30467v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep-learning models can achieve strong chest X-ray (CXR) classification performance without establishing whether their predictions predominantly rely...
By Abdullah Al Mamun, Md. Nasif Osman Khansur, Md Ashraful Hossen Akash, Md. Kishor Morol, Tze Hui Liew
The study investigates how few expert-annotated cases are needed to fine‑tune MedSAM3 for abdominal organ segmentation using Low‑Rank Adaptation (LoRA). With only 10 annotated CT or MRI cases, the LoRA‑adapted models achieve performance comparable to specialist systems that require orders of magnitude more data, including reliable gallbladder segmentation and near‑state‑of‑the‑art results for liver, kidneys, and spleen. The approach also generalizes to cardiac segmentation on the Whole Heart dataset, and training takes only 3–5 hours per organ on a single GPU, roughly twice as fast as nnU-Net.
By Sachin Dudda Nagaraju, Bendik Skarre Abrahamsen, Ashkan Moradi, Mattijs Elschot
Deep-learning models can achieve strong chest X-ray (CXR) classification performance without establishing whether their predictions predominantly rely on pulmonary image content. This study evaluates...
arXiv:2608.28716v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Deep learning segmentation models are often evaluated using geometric metrics such as Dice, HD95, and ASD, yet it remains unclear to what extent impr...
By Savvas Saragiotis, Pieter C. Gort, Lotte J. S. Fleurkens-Ewals, Anna F. van Herwijnen, Marion Tops-Welten, L. D. Kampmeijer, Joost Nederend, Fons van der Sommen
arXiv:2608. 15004v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and Computed Tomography (CT) is a primary imaging tool for screening and followup assessment.
By Pramit Dutta, Jenita Manokaran, Richa Mittal, Ryan Appleby, Eranga Ukwatta
Medical image segmentation is often framed as a search for stronger architectures, but this can obscure a more fundamental question: what does the dataset require from the model? In medical imaging, this requirement is shaped by foreground occupancy, morphology, boundary ambiguity, topology sensitivity, annotation quality, acquisition variation, and operating point.
Purpose: To evaluate whether large language model (LLM)-assisted label cleaning can identify label-report discordance in CT-RATE, a large-scale public chest CT dataset. Materials and Methods: After report-level deduplication, 24,446 unique radiology reports were identified.