arXiv AI

Making Alternative Data Work: Context-Augmented LLMs for Financial Forecasting

The paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can forecast a firm’s future financial performance by integrating alternative data—such as consumer transactions, web traffic, and prediction markets—with traditional financial information. A two‑agent framework is proposed: one agent identifies which alternative data channels are relevant for each firm, and the other uses firm‑ and channel‑specific context to predict revenue. Experiments across four commercial alternative data channels show that incorporating alternative data in context improves LLM forecasts over using either data source alone and outperforms standard forecasting baselines.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

LLM-based Agents for Forecasting and Prediction: Methods, Training, Evaluation, and Applications

arXiv:2608.23058v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) now support forecasting systems that combine language-based reasoning with temporal data, evidence retrieval, external too...

By Xiaogang Xu, Jiaqi Tang, Jianmin Chen, Yingying Yan, Zhenchao Tang, Xiangxin Zhou, Xiaobin Hu, Wei Wei, Jinfeng Wu, Qifeng Chen, Lu Zhou, Jiafei Wu, Zhe Liu, Jianwei Yin, Weimin Zheng
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 30

Can Language Models Learn to Forecast Stock Prices

arXiv:2609.36914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training has been shown to significantly improve language models' performance on tasks with verifiable outcomes, including mathematical reasoning,...

By Jiacheng Guo, Suozhi Huang, Shuzhen Li, Yunlong Gao, Zerui Cheng, Jason Ge, Shushu Liang, Zihao Li, Hao Lu, Ming Yin, Shilong Liu, Jiashuo Liu, Xu Kuang, Mengdi Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 2

LEAP: Likelihood Elicitation and Aggregation for LLM-based Probabilistic Forecasting

LEAP (Likelihood Elicitation and Aggregation for Probabilistic forecasting) is a new approach that reorganizes how evidence is used in LLM-based forecasting systems. Instead of a monolithic prediction that aggregates all evidence at once, LEAP examines each evidence item separately, elicits likelihood parameters, and combines them with an explicit prior to produce a posterior distribution. The method supports continuous, single-choice, and multi-choice forecasts and has been shown to improve prediction and calibration metrics across models on a benchmark covering forecasting, information-seeking, and browsing tasks.

By Yufei Chen, Yiran Zhao, Xiaogang Xu, Qipeng Xie, Jiafei Wu, Zhe Liu
arXiv Computation and Language
4d ago

FinLLM-KG: Knowledge Graph-Enhanced LLMs for Financial Sentiment Analysis in Algorithmic Trading

FinLLM-KG is a model‑agnostic framework that enhances financial sentiment analysis by integrating causal large language models with a financial knowledge graph derived from SEC 10‑K filings. It injects temporally grounded, company‑level context at inference time without updating model weights, allowing sentiment predictions to consider broader firm‑level information. The framework also attributes sentiment scores to individual sentences and retrieved knowledge‑graph facts, improving explainability and supporting human‑in‑the‑loop review, and simulations show it consistently outperforms state‑of‑the‑art baselines in portfolio performance.

By Giorgos Iacovides, Oliver Hannibal, Wuyang Zhou, Danilo Mandic
arXiv AI
Aug 5

CastFSR: A Fast--Slow--Reflect Agentic Reasoning Framework for Context-Aware Time Series Forecasting

arXiv:2608. 03031v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time series forecasting is fundamental to decision-making in complex systems, where future dynamics are influenced not only by historical observations but also by evolving contextual features.

By Xiaoyu Tao, Mingyue Cheng, Bokai Pan, Chuang Jiang, Huanjian Zhang, Tian Gao, Yaguo Liu, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 14

Information Specialization and Constrained Synthesis in Multi-Agent LLM Forecasting: A Prospective Live-Study of the 2026 FIFA World Cup

The study evaluates a multi‑agent large language model system for forecasting outcomes of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Two specialist agents—one quantitative and one news‑focused—produce forecasts that are then reviewed by a critic and combined by a meta‑agent. Results show the news specialist performs best, matching betting market accuracy, while the meta‑agent adds little beyond the specialists’ predictions.

By Julian Varghese, Lucas Bickmann, Sarah Sandmann