arXiv:2608. 02911v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Revenue forecasts guide acquisition budgets, demand planning, and customer-based valuations, yet an aggregate forecast does not show whether change reflects acquisition, repeat purchasing, spending per order, or offsetting movements.
By Kyeongbin Kim, Daniel McCarthy, Dokyun Lee
Large-scale retail and industrial forecasting systems contain many heterogeneous time series whose lifecycle, sparsity, volatility, seasonality, spectral patterns, and contextual sensitivity differ substantially. A single forecasting model rarely performs well across all regimes, while dense ensembles increase inference cost and provide limited insight into expert suitability.
arXiv:2609.13840v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A contract-logistics spare-parts operator is paid on order-level service: an order counts only if every requested line is fulfilled, yet forecasters ar...
By Joo Ern Chin, Shih-Fen Cheng, Aldy Gunawan
arXiv:2606. 08896v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-scale retail and industrial forecasting systems contain many heterogeneous time series whose lifecycle, sparsity, volatility, seasonality, spectral patterns, and contextual sensitivity differ substantially.
By Qianyang Li, Xingjun Zhang, Shaoxun Wang, Tao Peng, Jia Wei
arXiv:2609.24559v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We present $t_0$, a family of open-weights foundation models for forecasting with multivariate context. We release its first two members: $\texttt{t0-a...
By Lucas Meyer, Claudio Sole, Huikan Xiang, Nicolas Li, Lucas Franceschino, Arnau Quera-Bofarull, Maarten P. Scholl, Joachim Fainberg, Geoffrey N\'egiar
The paper demonstrates that the outcome of a forecasting leaderboard is largely determined by the evaluator’s design choices rather than the models themselves. By fixing the data, horizon, and period, the authors varied three key evaluation decisions—unit of analysis, error pooling, and scoring metric—and showed that each can reverse or eliminate the apparent superiority of any forecasting method. The study also evaluates the practical impact of these choices on a deployed system, revealing that the selection rule captures a significant portion of the potential performance gain, and confirms the findings on an external public dataset.
By Md Rezwanul Islam, Wael Mohammed
arXiv:2607. 13331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retail demand forecasts are reused across replenishment, capacity, labor, and transportation planning cycles.
By Jize Li, Jiani He, Dishu Yang, Dingyan Shang, Jingjing Liu, Shiqi Huang
arXiv:2608. 07037v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Small businesses often have only 12-24 months of accounting history, yet planning and risk workflows require coordinated forecasts across financial statements.
By Shrutendra Harsola, Vignesh Subrahmaniam
RATL is a plug‑in method for multivariate time‑series forecasting that uses a frozen base forecaster to build a memory of its historical forecast residuals. During inference, RATL retrieves residual trajectories from similar past contexts and employs a set‑aware router to combine them, providing learned feedback correction. Experiments demonstrate that this residual‑retrieval approach improves the performance of the base forecaster across various benchmarks and backbones.
By Yuchen He, Yueyang Cang, Zhiyuan Ning, Ningyu Wang, Li Shi
arXiv:2607. 16354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retail demand forecasting remains difficult when demand shifts faster than static forecasting models can be retrained, especially in early demand cycles where newly observed labels are sparse.
By Zhiwei Lei, Benedict Jun Ma, Ilya Jackson
CEDAR is a two‑stage framework for demand forecasting that incorporates planned actions and external event signals. Stage I uses an Action‑Interleaved Transformer to model controllable state transitions under interventions, while Stage II applies a Residual Correction Module that aligns event descriptions with product context using LLM‑assisted text representations. Experiments on a large Alibaba 1688 dataset show that CEDAR improves simulation accuracy over traditional time‑series forecasting baselines and benefits real‑world budget planning.
By Junjie Meng, Ranxu Zhang, Zi-an Zhang, Shujun Liu, Xiaoning Qi, Xiaozhou Xu, Yanyong Zhang, Hui Xiong, Chao Wang
The paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can forecast a firm’s future financial performance by integrating alternative data—such as consumer transactions, web traffic, and prediction markets—with traditional financial information. A two‑agent framework is proposed: one agent identifies which alternative data channels are relevant for each firm, and the other uses firm‑ and channel‑specific context to predict revenue. Experiments across four commercial alternative data channels show that incorporating alternative data in context improves LLM forecasts over using either data source alone and outperforms standard forecasting baselines.
By Jihoon Kwon, Lawrence Liu, Daekyung Park, Sumin Kim, Haverty Jack, Hoyoung Lee, Katherine Bjorkman, Josh McKenney, Peter Laurelli, Nicole Kagan, Zach Golkhou, Thorsten Neumann, Edward Tong, Pete Petersen, Yoon Kim, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Yongjae Lee, Chanyeol Choi