arXiv Machine Learning

An Axiomatic Assessment of Entropy- and Variance-based Uncertainty Quantification in Regression

arXiv:2504. 18433v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Uncertainty quantification is crucial in machine learning, yet most (axiomatic) studies of uncertainty measures focus on classification, leaving a gap in regression settings with limited formal justification and evaluations.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

What Uncertainties Do We Need for Dynamical Systems?

arXiv:2606. 11988v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The distinction between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty has received considerable attention in machine learning research, mainly in the context of supervised learning but also in other settings such as generative modeling.

By Yusuf Sale, Christopher B\"ulte, Felix Czaja, Joshua Stiller, Eyke H\"ullermeier
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review

The review examines how Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) can enhance machine learning applied to biosignals such as EEG, ECG, EOG, and EMG. It surveys 53 papers, outlining current methods, shortcomings, and theoretical frameworks, while highlighting misconceptions and gaps in diagnostic and prosthetic control contexts. The authors recommend further research on human-system interaction with UQ models in clinical settings.

By Ivo Pascal de Jong, Andreea Ioana Sburlea, Matias Valdenegro-Toro
arXiv AI
Jun 26

Decision-Aligned Evaluation of Uncertainty Quantification

arXiv:2606. 26990v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Uncertainty estimates in machine learning are typically evaluated using generic metrics such as the negative log-likelihood and expected calibration error, yet good performance on such metrics does not necessarily imply high utility in downstream decisions.

By Annika Schneider, Tommy Rochussen, Joshua Stiller, Vincent Fortuin