arXiv Machine Learning June 11, 2026 By Yusuf Sale, Christopher B\"ulte, Felix Czaja, Joshua Stiller, Eyke H\"ullermeier

What Uncertainties Do We Need for Dynamical Systems?

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 11988v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The distinction between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty has received considerable attention in machine learning research, mainly in the context of supervised learning but also in other settings such as generative modeling.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 7

An Axiomatic Assessment of Entropy- and Variance-based Uncertainty Quantification in Regression

arXiv:2504. 18433v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Uncertainty quantification is crucial in machine learning, yet most (axiomatic) studies of uncertainty measures focus on classification, leaving a gap in regression settings with limited formal justification and evaluations.

By Christopher B\"ulte, Yusuf Sale, Timo L\"ohr, Paul Hofman, Gitta Kutyniok, Eyke H\"ullermeier

arXiv AI

Jul 17

Decision Making Needs Uncertainty Quantification [Lecture Notes]

arXiv:2607. 14407v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many signal processing systems ultimately exist to {act}.

By Osvaldo Simeone

agents

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 19

Quantifying Aleatoric Uncertainty of In-Context Learning for Robust Measure of LLM Prediction Confidence

arXiv:2606. 19353v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In-Context Learning (ICL) allows LLMs to adapt to new tasks from a few demonstrations, but its reliability remains a concern: predictions are highly sensitive to both prompt design and the model's ability to understand the context, obscuring whether failures arise from data properties or model limitations.

By Jinseok Chung, Minkyoung Song, Hyunji Jung, Namhoon Lee

llms benchmarks safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 30

Structurally Separated Uncertainty in Supervised Latent Variable Models

arXiv:2602. 11219v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Predictive uncertainty is commonly decomposed into epistemic and aleatoric components, but standard decompositions often produce strongly correlated estimates because both quantities are derived from the same predictive distribution.

By Tanmoy Mukherjee, Marius Kloft, Pierre Marquis, Zied Bouraoui

benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 17

Subjective Risk Decomposition: A New View for Uncertainty Quantification

arXiv:2607. 15196v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a novel viewpoint for uncertainty quantification.

By Raghad Alamri, Michele Caprio, Gavin Brown

arXiv Machine Learning

Sep 4

Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review

The review examines how Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) can enhance machine learning applied to biosignals such as EEG, ECG, EOG, and EMG. It surveys 53 papers, outlining current methods, shortcomings, and theoretical frameworks, while highlighting misconceptions and gaps in diagnostic and prosthetic control contexts. The authors recommend further research on human-system interaction with UQ models in clinical settings.

By Ivo Pascal de Jong, Andreea Ioana Sburlea, Matias Valdenegro-Toro

safety

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

An Axiomatic Assessment of Entropy- and Variance-based Uncertainty Quantification in Regression

Decision Making Needs Uncertainty Quantification [Lecture Notes]

Quantifying Aleatoric Uncertainty of In-Context Learning for Robust Measure of LLM Prediction Confidence

Structurally Separated Uncertainty in Supervised Latent Variable Models

Subjective Risk Decomposition: A New View for Uncertainty Quantification

Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Biosignal Applications -- A Review