arXiv Computer Vision

FlowCPO: A Unified Divergence View of Preference Alignment for Flow Models

arXiv AI
1d ago

A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment

The paper introduces Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order method that aligns large language models with human preferences using comparison oracles instead of direct differentiable loss optimization. It provides theoretical convergence guarantees for both offline and online variants under smoothness, gradient sparsity, and oracle compatibility assumptions, and establishes performance bounds under local coverage and in-distribution reward accuracy. Experiments on several LLMs (Mistral, Llama, Gemma-2, Qwen3, Gemma-3) show that ComPO outperforms existing direct alignment methods, achieving higher length-controlled win rates and diagnostics that suggest mitigation of likelihood displacement.

By Peter Chen, Xi Chen, Wotao Yin, Tianyi Lin
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

When Can Conditional Flow Matching Replace Pointwise Negative Log-Likelihood?

The paper investigates when conditional flow matching (CFM) can replace pointwise negative log-likelihood (NLL) calculations. It shows that for linear Gaussian paths, the endpoint NLL can be exactly decomposed into entropy, a weighted CFM objective, and residual terms, meaning CFM-only estimates are exact only when these residuals cancel. The study finds that ordinary CFM is generally not a pointwise NLL estimator, and even weighted variants may not fully eliminate bias, especially in training or on‑policy settings, with experiments confirming these theoretical insights.

By Yansen Han, Hongxin Sun, Tao Lin
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Drifting Preference Optimization for One-Step Generative Models

arXiv:2606. 02521v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: One-step text-to-image generators are attractive for deployment because they generate an image with a single forward pass, but preference finetuning them remains difficult: standard alignment methods often rely on policy likelihoods, denoising trajectories, differentiable reward gradients, or test-time optimization.

By Zhou Jiang, Yandong Wen, Zhen Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26

Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Policies for Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv:2510. 09976v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models such as OpenVLA, Octo, and $\pi_0$ have shown strong generalization by leveraging large-scale demonstrations, yet their performance is still fundamentally constrained by the quality and coverage of supervised data.

By Mingyang Lyu, Yinqian Sun, Erliang Lin, Huangrui Li, Ruolin Chen, Feifei Zhao, Yi Zeng
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 1

Drifting Preference Optimization for One-Step Generative Models

One-step text-to-image generators are attractive for deployment because they generate an image with a single forward pass, but preference finetuning them remains difficult: standard alignment methods often rely on policy likelihoods, denoising trajectories, differentiable reward gradients, or test-time optimization. We propose Drifting Preference Optimization (DrPO), an online preference-finetuning method for deterministic one-step generators.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

Latent Reward Registers for Diffusion Preference Alignment

arXiv:2608. 03929v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning diffusion models with human preferences usually relies on a sparse terminal reward evaluated on the final generated samples, presenting a severe temporal credit-assignment challenge across the multi-step denoising process.

By Yuanshen Guan, Zipeng Feng, Zhiwei Xiong, Peiqin Sun