arXiv AI
Aug 5

GROW: Group-Relative Advantage-Weighted On-Policy Reinforcement Learning of Autoregressive-Diffusion Text-to-Speech model

arXiv:2608. 03215v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning for flow-matching text-to-speech is complicated by deterministic ODE sampling: trajectory-level policy-gradient methods typically convert the ODE into an SDE and track per-step likelihood ratios, introducing stochastic perturbations and substantial overhead.

By Guanrou Yang, Tian Tan, Qian Chen, Ziyang Ma, Yakun Song, Zhikang Niu, Qi Chen, Wenming Tu, Haitao Li, Shan Yang, Xie Chen
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Enhancing Reasoning for Diffusion LLMs via Distribution Matching Policy Optimization

arXiv:2510. 08233v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) are promising alternatives to autoregressive large language models (AR-LLMs), as they potentially allow higher inference throughput.

By Yuchen Zhu, Wei Guo, Jaemoo Choi, Petr Molodyk, Bo Yuan, Molei Tao, Yongxin Chen
arXiv AI
Oct 1

CAST: Causal Advantage-Structured Training with Spatially Grounded Compositional Rewards for Diffusion Models

CAST introduces a reinforcement‑learning fine‑tuning framework for diffusion models that addresses three key limitations: it automatically selects the denoising window based on each model’s trajectory, decomposes prompts into verifiable semantic atoms via Causal Scene Graphs, and applies atom‑level rewards spatially weighted in the policy objective. The method is applied to FLUX.2‑dev and Qwen‑Image‑2512, yielding up to 3.07× improvement on the hardest GenEval 2 prompts compared with Flow‑GRPO while also enhancing overall generation quality.

By Shu Yu, Chaochao Lu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Optimizers for Diffusion Models: A Controlled Benchmark

The paper introduces the first controlled benchmark for optimizers in discrete diffusion models, evaluating seven optimizers (AdamW, Lion, Muon, SOAP, MARS, MARS‑M, Schedule‑Free) across four diffusion formulations: masked diffusion on text8, uniform diffusion on QM9 and LM1B, and Gaussian diffusion on CelebA‑64. Each optimizer undergoes the same search protocol and is retrained with full budget and multiple seeds, revealing that AdamW, while strong, is not universally optimal and that optimizers validated on autoregressive language models (Muon, MARS‑M, SOAP) can outperform tuned AdamW on certain tasks.

By Arman Bolatov, Egor Shulgin, David Li, Abduragim Shtanchaev, Sebastian U. Stich, Maxim Panov, Eric Moulines, Peter Richt\'arik, Martin Tak\'a\v{c}