arXiv AI By Peter Chen, Xi Chen, Wotao Yin, Tianyi Lin

A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order method that aligns large language models with human preferences using comparison oracles instead of direct differentiable loss optimization. It provides theoretical convergence guarantees for both offline and online variants under smoothness, gradient sparsity, and oracle compatibility assumptions, and establishes performance bounds under local coverage and in-distribution reward accuracy. Experiments on several LLMs (Mistral, Llama, Gemma-2, Qwen3, Gemma-3) show that ComPO outperforms existing direct alignment methods, achieving higher length-controlled win rates and diagnostics that suggest mitigation of likelihood displacement.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 11

TokenRatio: Principled Token-Level Preference Optimization via Ratio Matching

arXiv:2605. 12288v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a widely used RL-free method for aligning language models from pairwise preferences, but it models preferences over full sequences even though generation is driven by per-token decisions.

By Truong Nguyen, Tien-Phat Nguyen, Linh Ngo Van, Duy Minh Ho Nguyen, Khoa Doan, Trung Le
arXiv AI
Sep 10

DSPA: Dynamic SAE Steering for Data-Efficient Preference Alignment

The paper introduces DSPA, a dynamic sparse autoencoder (SAE) steering technique that aligns language model outputs with user preferences during inference, avoiding costly weight updates. DSPA constructs a conditional-difference map from preference triples to adjust token-active latents, improving MT‑Bench scores and matching AlpacaEval performance on models like Gemma‑2 and Qwen3 while preserving accuracy. It demonstrates robustness with limited preference data, outperforms the two‑stage RAHF‑SCIT pipeline in FLOPs, and reveals that preference directions are largely driven by discourse and stylistic cues.

By James Wedgwood, Aashiq Muhamed, Mona T. Diab, Virginia Smith