arXiv:2609.02697v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep learning models have achieved impressive performance in medical image diagnosis, yet their deployment in clinical settings remains constrained by...
By David A. Kelly, Tom Yaacov, Nathan Blake, Sander Beckers, Hana Chockler
arXiv:2606. 25375v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the rapid adoption of generative AI, synthetic medical images pose growing risks, including diagnostic deception and insurance fraud.
By Ching-Hao Chiu, Hao-Wei Chung, Gelei Xu, Xueyang Li, Pin-Yu Chen, John Kheir, Meysam Ghaffari, Carlos Morato, Ahmed Abbasi, Yiyu Shi
Deep learning models have achieved impressive performance in medical image diagnosis, yet their deployment in clinical settings remains constrained by limited explainability. Counterfactual images pro...
arXiv:2606. 04009v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two-sample testing is a fundamental tool for detecting distributional differences across scientific domains, but classical tests (including kernel-based tests) can be ineffective on high-dimensional structured data such as images.
By Wei-Cheng Lai, Marco Simnacher, Christoph Lippert
arXiv:2504. 19621v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning (ML) systems for medical imaging have demonstrated remarkable diagnostic capabilities, but their susceptibility to biases poses significant risks, since biases may negatively impact generalization performance.
By Haroui Ma, Francesco Quinzan, Theresa Willem, Stefan Bauer
The paper introduces a classifier‑free method for generating visual counterfactual explanations (VCEs) using Contrastive Analysis (CA). By separating generative factors common to two datasets from those specific to each class, the approach swaps only the salient factors to produce counterfactual images, thereby avoiding reliance on classifier decision boundaries. Leveraging StyleGAN2’s high‑quality synthesis and a feature‑space latent representation, the method supports multiple salient factors per dataset and achieves superior counterfactual quality on three medical imaging datasets.
By Yunlong He, Pietro Gori
arXiv:2607. 02596v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep learning models for medical diagnosis frequently exhibit substantial performance disparities across sensitive subgroups (e.
By Xinyu Jia, Weidong Guo, Wangyuan Zhao, Yi Guo, Zeju Li, Yuanyuan Wang
With the rapid adoption of generative AI, synthetic medical images pose growing risks, including diagnostic deception and insurance fraud. Although prior work has explored vision-language model (VLM)-based synthetic image detection, these evaluations typically consider images in isolation.
arXiv:2607. 14984v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Per-subgroup fairness audits of medical image classifiers face a sample-size problem: minority subgroups in held-out test sets have so few samples that the resulting confidence intervals on per-subgroup performance are wider than the bias the audit is meant to detect.
By Mahmoud Ibrahim, Bart Elen, Chang Sun, Gokhan Ertaylan, Michel Dumontier
arXiv:2509. 19671v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Public datasets of Chest X-Rays (CXRs) have long been a popular benchmark for developing machine learning (ML) computer vision models in healthcare.
By Andrew Wang, Jiashuo Zhang, Michael Oberst
arXiv:2602.01718v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Predicting generalization from quantities available before target-test evaluation remains a central challenge in deep learning. The systematic benc...
By Sora Nakai, Youssef Fadhloun, Kacem Mathlouthi, Kotaro Yoshida, Ganesh Talluri, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Hiroki Naganuma
arXiv:2608.29456v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation, triage, and clinical decision support, understanding its v...
By Basudha Pal, Arjun Narayanan, Neha Ajith, Vikas R Bhat, Muhammad Umair