arXiv AI By Wei-Cheng Lai, Marco Simnacher, Christoph Lippert

Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Two-Sample Testing

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 04009v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two-sample testing is a fundamental tool for detecting distributional differences across scientific domains, but classical tests (including kernel-based tests) can be ineffective on high-dimensional structured data such as images.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 24

Zero-Flow Two-Sample Tests

arXiv:2607. 21542v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose a new approach to two-sample testing for deciding whether two sets of samples are drawn from the same distribution.

By Yakun Wang, Leyang Wang, Song Liu, Taiji Suzuki
arXiv AI
Jul 17

Demographically-Conditioned Synthetic Medical Images for Bias Mitigation and Bias Detection in Disease Classifiers

arXiv:2607. 14984v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Per-subgroup fairness audits of medical image classifiers face a sample-size problem: minority subgroups in held-out test sets have so few samples that the resulting confidence intervals on per-subgroup performance are wider than the bias the audit is meant to detect.

By Mahmoud Ibrahim, Bart Elen, Chang Sun, Gokhan Ertaylan, Michel Dumontier
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9

Counterfactual Modeling with Fine-Tuned LLMs for Health Intervention Design and Sensor Data Augmentation

arXiv:2601. 14590v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) provide human-centric interpretability by identifying the minimal, actionable changes required to alter a machine learning model's prediction.

By Shovito Barua Soumma, Asiful Arefeen, Stephanie M. Carpenter, Melanie Hingle, Hassan Ghasemzadeh