arXiv AI
To do($x$) or not to do($x$): Medical Image Counterfactuals for Dataset Augmentation
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 22
Generating Chest X-Ray Counterfactuals by Specialising Foundation Image Models
arXiv:2609.24879v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactual image generation answers questions about how a subject would have looked under retrospective, hypothetical scenarios. Recent methods hav...
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3
Generating Medical Image Counterfactuals using Causal Explanations
The paper introduces a new framework for generating medical image counterfactuals that does not rely on auxiliary generative models. By extracting causal evidence directly from a classifier, the method deterministically produces edits within user-specified regions, requiring no additional training. Experiments on real-world medical imaging datasets show that these counterfactuals alter classifier predictions while staying closer to the original image than generative baselines, offering a clearer view of the model’s decision boundary.
arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago
A Causal Bootstrap for Diverse Image Generation under Unobserved Confounding
The paper introduces CauVaDE, a causal generative model that represents an unobserved confounder as a discrete latent cluster, enabling accurate approximation of both observational and interventional image distributions. It demonstrates that this representation can capture diverse causal explanations without sacrificing fit to the data. A novel causal bootstrap method is proposed to vary confounder entropy, producing a family of distinct interventional image distributions.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2
Generating Medical Image Counterfactuals using Causal Explanations
The paper introduces a new method for generating medical image counterfactuals that does not rely on auxiliary generative models. By extracting causal evidence directly from the classifier, the approach deterministically edits user-specified regions to alter predictions while staying closer to the original image than generative baselines. Experiments on real-world medical imaging datasets show that this technique provides a more direct and transparent view of the classifier’s decision boundary.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 12
Causal Variational Deep Embedding: A Family of Interventional Generators for Confounded Images
arXiv:2606. 21806v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep generative models reproduce the observational distribution of their training data, inheriting any spurious associations it contains.
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 24
Counterfactual Stress Testing for Image Classification Models
arXiv:2605.10894v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep learning models in medical imaging often fail when deployed in new clinical environments due to distribution shifts in demographics, scanner h...