The paper introduces REMI, a framework that treats counterfactual fairness as a relational invariant discovery problem. By learning over paired examples, REMI identifies input regions where fairness is violated and generates interpretable rule-based models—fairness invariants—that can block or relabel unfair predictions without retraining the underlying model. Experiments on symbolic and neural network programs show REMI localizes fairness bugs in over 83% of cases and reduces discriminatory decisions in black-box models by up to 70%.
arXiv:2609.16321v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing fairness analysis tools predominantly operate as post-training evaluation frameworks, requiring practitioners to complete the full model dev...
arXiv:2607. 05101v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The application of machine learning-based predictive algorithms to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) has grown rapidly, driven by the vast volume of financial transaction data available to banks.
arXiv:2606. 20461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning models have been shown to exhibit discriminatory outcomes or degraded performance for individuals at the intersection of multiple sensitive attributes, such as race and gender.
arXiv:2605. 05882v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artificial-intelligence systems are becoming ubiquitous in society, yet their predictions typically inherit biases with respect to protected attributes such as race, gender, or age.
arXiv:2509. 16462v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes decision-making systems, where biased predictions can reinforce social and economic disparities.
arXiv:2604. 27011v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AutoML, intended as the process of automating the application of machine learning to real-world problems, is a key step for AI popularisation.
arXiv:2606. 06514v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning systems deployed in high stakes socioeconomic settings routinely display bias.
arXiv:2607. 22045v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactual explanations are a prominent approach in explainable artificial intelligence (xAI), providing actionable guidance on what input changes would alter a model's prediction to a desired outcome.
arXiv:2609.39025v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fairness assessment in algorithmic decisions that affect individuals, such as credit scoring, often relies on parity measures calculated at the aggre...
arXiv:2404. 01356v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations that can simultaneously degrade prediction robustness and individual fairness across diverse application settings.
arXiv:2608. 14161v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs exhibit social biases that can produce inaccurate and discriminatory inferences, posing risks in high-stakes applications.
The paper investigates explanation fairness in hate‑speech detection, noting that high classification accuracy does not guarantee equally plausible explanations for all demographic groups. Using the HateXplain dataset, the authors introduce Plausibility‑EFG, a metric that quantifies the largest difference in explanation plausibility across groups by comparing model‑generated token attributions with human‑annotated rationales. Experiments with BERT, RoBERTa, and an adversarially trained ADV‑RoBERTa show that the latter improves both classification performance and alignment with human rationales while reducing explanation disparities, and the study highlights that predictive fairness and explanation fairness are related but distinct objectives.