arXiv:2604. 16610v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning models often inherit biases from historical data, raising critical concerns about fairness and accountability.
By Yixiao Lin, James Booth
arXiv:2606. 00656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ensuring fair and equitable treatment across diverse groups, particularly in multi-class classification tasks, poses a significant challenge due to the persistent biases inherent in machine learning models.
By Li Zhang, Yuyuan Li, XiaoHua Feng, Jiaming Zhang, Fengyuan Yu, Chaochao Chen
arXiv:2609.40034v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Over the past decade, Machine Learning (ML) has been trained under dual objectives: minimizing prediction error via Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM)...
By Ayoub Ajarra, Debabrota Basu
arXiv:2609.16321v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Existing fairness analysis tools predominantly operate as post-training evaluation frameworks, requiring practitioners to complete the full model dev...
By Archit Rathod, Saeid Tizpaz-Niari
arXiv:2602. 16794v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) offers distribution-free uncertainty quantification for machine learning models, yet its interplay with fairness in downstream decision-making remains underexplored.
By Pengqi Liu, Zijun Yu, Mouloud Belbahri, Arthur Charpentier, Masoud Asgharian, Jesse C. Cresswell
arXiv:2606. 17810v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we establish a set of theoretical impossibility results, termed the No-Free-Fairness theorems, that identify three fundamental sources of disparity in learning systems.
By Khoat Than