arXiv:2606. 24967v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In ill-posed inverse problems, the recovered solution depends as much on the prior as on the data, yet much of the engineering knowledge that could serve as that prior is recorded qualitatively rather than in formal mathematical form.
By Taiga Saito, Yu Otake, Daijiro Mizutani, Sopheakpolin Mom
arXiv:2609.20978v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: High-consequence subsurface decisions often rely on sparse data that permit competing geological interpretations. Determining consistency of these...
By Harun Ur Rashid, Daniel O'Malley
The paper introduces a workflow that ranks competing geological interpretations by converting them into spatial priors and assessing their consistency with hydraulic‑head observations. Using a text‑to‑image model to generate 1600 geologic images per interpretation, a variational autoencoder encodes them, and a supervised inverse network maps head data into this latent space, producing log‑conductivity fields for flow simulation. The method is validated on a synthetic Johansen Formation benchmark and applied to two conceptual models of the Culebra Dolomite, yielding compatibility scores that align with independent evidence.
By Harun Ur Rashid, Daniel O'Malley
arXiv:2610.19187v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Full waveform inversion (FWI) is a powerful tool for high-resolution subsurface model reconstruction, but it remains highly nonlinear and ill-posed,...
By Chao Li, Mrinal K. Sen, Sergey Fomel, Yangkang Chen
arXiv:2603. 06829v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Subsurface ore detection is of paramount importance given the rising depletion of shallow mineral resources in recent years.
By Dhruman Gupta (Ashoka University), Yashas Shende (Ashoka University), Aritra Das (Ashoka University), Chanda Grover Kamra (Ashoka University), Debayan Gupta (Ashoka University)
arXiv:2607. 04982v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-resolution velocity models are crucial for reservoir characterization and subsurface delineation.
By Francesco Brandolin, Tariq Alkhalifah
arXiv:2609.36193v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Learning from scientific measurements often requires aligning modalities with different spatial support and resolution. Subsurface characterization is...
By Meher Gajula, Keyla Gonzalez, Ben Lasscock, Alejandro Valenciano
arXiv:2606. 25000v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To evaluate whether vision-language models can reason about geological histories, it is necessary to construct observations for which the underlying process history is known.
By Lukas Mosser
arXiv:2608. 08959v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gravimetry images subsurface density contrasts associated with geological structures, geothermal systems, and intrusive bodies.
By Le\'on Suarez-Rodriguez, Paul Goyes-Pe\~nafiel, Javier Torres-Quintero, Henry Arguello
Autoregressive modelling, successful in language tasks, is applied to mineral‑exploration drillholes where lithology is revealed sequentially from shallow to deep. The authors introduce DrillBench, a benchmark of 49,671 Western Australian drillholes for next‑layer prediction and autoregressive stratigraphic generation across a graded transfer spectrum. Experiments show that spatial conditioning helps locally but fails under strong shift, while autoregressive models transfer more robustly; a backbone‑agnostic recipe combining large‑scale pretraining and spatial retrieval improves generalisation, especially in distant geological splits.
By Yihao Ding, Daniel Yitian Su, Yiran Zhang, Christopher M. Gonzalez, Wei Liu
arXiv:2610. 09281v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In Bayesian inverse problems, posterior sampling requires generating samples that are consistent with given observations while capturing the range of plausible solutions.
By Shiqin Zeng, Zijun Deng, Felix J. Herrmann
The paper introduces OCL-PDE, a generative framework for solving partial differential equation (PDE) inverse problems. It uses a learned observation‑complementary latent representation that retains reconstruction‑relevant information and combines it with observations to recover unknown fields. The method, built on a physics‑aware autoencoder and conditional Flow Matching, improves reconstruction accuracy and fine‑detail recovery compared to baseline approaches.