arXiv:2508. 09156v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present a framework for fine-tuning flow-matching generative models to enforce physical constraints and solve inverse problems in scientific systems.
By Jan Tauberschmidt, Sophie Fellenz, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Andrew B. Duncan
arXiv:2609.36527v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recovering complete physical fields from sparse observations is challenging because the measurements may not uniquely determine the underlying state. D...
By Ruichen Xu, Siyao Wang, Fang Wan, Jiacheng Qiu, Wenhan Gao, Jiaxing Zhang, Linsey Pang, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Prakhar Mehrotra, Yann LeCun, Yuefan Deng
The paper introduces MS-Flow, a method that represents a flow-based generative model’s trajectory as a sequence of intermediate latent states instead of a single initial code. By enforcing local flow dynamics and coupling trajectory segments with matching penalties, the approach alternates between updating latent states and ensuring consistency with observed data. This strategy reduces memory usage and improves reconstruction quality on tasks such as image inpainting, super‑resolution, and computed tomography.
By Alexander Denker, Zeljko Kereta, Carola-Bibiane Sch\"onlieb, Moshe Eliasof
arXiv:2602. 09303v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a physics-informed consistency modeling framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) via fast, few-step generative inference.
By Che-Chia Chang, Chen-Yang Dai, Te-Sheng Lin, Ming-Chih Lai, Chieh-Hsin Lai
SBNO (Schr"odinger Bridge Neural Operator) is an equation‑free framework that learns conditional operators for both forward and inverse PDE problems using paired data and a diffusion Schr"odinger bridge matching approach. It preserves empirical input‑solution pairing through a mask‑aware endpoint coupling and supports both task directions within a single model. At inference, SBNO generates deterministic reconstructions via a probability‑flow ODE, achieving comparable or superior accuracy on five PDE benchmarks with only 5% observations, while being at least 9.7× faster and using 4.3× less GPU memory than guided‑diffusion baselines.
By Jaehyeon Park, Inhyeok Jeong, Noseong Park
PosteriorBench is a new benchmark that evaluates how well generative inverse solvers recover full posterior distributions rather than just a single reconstruction. It tests four physics-based inverse problems—Darcy flow inversion, Poisson source recovery, carbon capture and storage, and light transport material inference—using high-fidelity reference posteriors generated by rejection sampling and MCMC. The benchmark employs five metrics (posterior-mean error, posterior-standard-deviation error, maximum mean discrepancy, sliced Wasserstein distance, and radially averaged power-spectrum error) to assess pointwise accuracy, uncertainty, distributional alignment, and global frequency fidelity, revealing significant distribution-matching gaps in current solvers and highlighting the importance of neural operators, guidance weights, and generation noise for posterior-variance calibration.
By Jiachen Yao, Zi-Siang Hsu, Xi Deng, Aditi Gupta, Xin Ju, Sally M Benson, Gege Wen, Anima Anandkumar
The paper introduces GeoLAMP, a Geometry-aware Latent Autoregressive generative Model designed to solve multiphysics partial differential equations in highly irregular, micro‑scale tortuous geometries. GeoLAMP employs a dual‑encoder graph architecture to capture both global topology and fine‑scale geometry, transforms real‑space fields into compact latent representations, and uses a causal self‑attention transformer with flow matching for stable, scalable block‑wise autoregressive prediction. The model is evaluated on three benchmark datasets—reactive flow, heat convection, and elasticity—showing consistently low errors across the entire rollout horizon.
By Zi Wang, Minghui Xu, Tapan Mukerji
arXiv:2606. 26592v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose latent-space diffusion posterior sampling (L-DPS), an approximate Bayesian framework for high-dimensional inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Yuanzhe Wang, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv:2602. 02948v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Inverse problems are fundamental to many scientific and engineering disciplines; they arise when one seeks to reconstruct hidden, underlying quantities from noisy measurements.
By Jack Michael Solomon, Rishi Leburu, Matthias Chung
arXiv:2601. 17074v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Accurate estimation in time-varying inverse problems under limited and sparse observations remains a fundamental challenge across scientific domains.
By Akila Sampath, Vandana Janeja, Jianwu Wang
The paper introduces the Ensemble-conditioned Inverse Problem (EIP), a multivariate statistical framework for inferring an ensemble that follows the pushforward of a prior through a forward process. It applies to fields such as high‑energy physics, full waveform inversion, and inverse imaging, and proposes non‑iterative inference‑time methods using ensemble inverse generative models that avoid explicit forward model use during inference. The authors demonstrate the approach on synthetic and real datasets and provide code for replication.
By Zhengyan Huan, Camila Pazos, Martin Klassen, Vincent Croft, Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin, Shuchin Aeron
arXiv:2607. 22215v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this study, we introduce latent PDE mapping, a broadly applicable physics-informed learning technique designed to enable efficient geometric generalization with sparse training data.
By Ingvild Askim Adde, Mary M. Maleckar, Gabriel Balaban