The paper introduces a workflow that ranks competing geological interpretations by converting them into spatial priors and assessing their consistency with hydraulic‑head observations. Using a text‑to‑image model to generate 1600 geologic images per interpretation, a variational autoencoder encodes them, and a supervised inverse network maps head data into this latent space, producing log‑conductivity fields for flow simulation. The method is validated on a synthetic Johansen Formation benchmark and applied to two conceptual models of the Culebra Dolomite, yielding compatibility scores that align with independent evidence.
By Harun Ur Rashid, Daniel O'Malley
arXiv:2605. 03383v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Geological interpretation infers subsurface properties and structures from indirect geophysical observations.
By Xiaoyu Tao, Mingyue Cheng, Jiahao Wang, Yitong Zhou, Qingyang Mao, Yimin Dou, Qi Liu, Shijin Wang, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2609.36193v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Learning from scientific measurements often requires aligning modalities with different spatial support and resolution. Subsurface characterization is...
By Meher Gajula, Keyla Gonzalez, Ben Lasscock, Alejandro Valenciano
arXiv:2606. 24967v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In ill-posed inverse problems, the recovered solution depends as much on the prior as on the data, yet much of the engineering knowledge that could serve as that prior is recorded qualitatively rather than in formal mathematical form.
By Taiga Saito, Yu Otake, Daijiro Mizutani, Sopheakpolin Mom
arXiv:2607. 16050v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pluvial (rainfall-driven) flooding accounts for 45% of National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) claims in the United States and is harder to predict than its riverine and coastal counterparts, with existing approaches limited to coarse resolution, regional domains, or computationally intensive process-based models unsuitable for daily continental-scale use.
By Yuya Kawakami, Daniel Cayan, Dongyu Liu, Kwan-Liu Ma, Tom Corringham
arXiv:2603.25779v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Groundwater represents a key element of the water cycle, yet it exhibits complex and context-dependent relationships that make its modeling c...
By Matteo Salis, Gabriele Sartor, Rosa Meo, Stefano Ferraris, Abdourrahmane M. Atto
arXiv:2602. 22188v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modelling rock-fluid interaction requires solving a set of partial differential equations (PDEs) to predict the flow behaviour and the reactions of the fluid with the rock on the interfaces.
By Nathalie C. Pinheiro, Donghu Guo, Hannah P. Menke, Aniket C. Joshi, Claire E. Heaney, Ahmed H. ElSheikh, Christopher C. Pain
arXiv:2607. 22804v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate geological characterization of subsurface reservoirs from well log data is essential to support projects such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), geothermal development, and extraction of natural resources.
By Shwetha Salimath, Francesca Bugiotti, Sylvain Wlodarczyk, Sohaib Ouzineb
arXiv:2608. 09276v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Planetary geology relies on historical, interpretive reasoning to reconstruct past events from diverse observations.
By Tom Sander, Kay Wohlfarth, Christian W\"ohler
arXiv:2606. 25000v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To evaluate whether vision-language models can reason about geological histories, it is necessary to construct observations for which the underlying process history is known.
By Lukas Mosser
arXiv:2601. 01558v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting river flow in places without streamflow records is challenging because basins respond differently to climate, terrain, vegetation, and soils.
By Pengfei Qu, Wenyu Ouyang, Chi Zhang, Yikai Chai, Shuolong Xu, Lei Ye, Yongri Piao, Miao Zhang, Huchuan Lu
arXiv:2605. 24844v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) applied to Geology often hallucinate when reasoning about subsurface structures and deep-time evolution, current AI in Earth sciences predominantly targets surface remote sensing and GIS.
By Chenyou Guo, Zongqi Liu, Yizhou Zhang, Zhaorui Jiang, Ze Liu