PosteriorBench is a new benchmark that evaluates how well generative inverse solvers recover full posterior distributions rather than just a single reconstruction. It tests four physics-based inverse problems—Darcy flow inversion, Poisson source recovery, carbon capture and storage, and light transport material inference—using high-fidelity reference posteriors generated by rejection sampling and MCMC. The benchmark employs five metrics (posterior-mean error, posterior-standard-deviation error, maximum mean discrepancy, sliced Wasserstein distance, and radially averaged power-spectrum error) to assess pointwise accuracy, uncertainty, distributional alignment, and global frequency fidelity, revealing significant distribution-matching gaps in current solvers and highlighting the importance of neural operators, guidance weights, and generation noise for posterior-variance calibration.
By Jiachen Yao, Zi-Siang Hsu, Xi Deng, Aditi Gupta, Xin Ju, Sally M Benson, Gege Wen, Anima Anandkumar
arXiv:2609.12953v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Flow matching approaches to imaging inverse problems commonly incorporate measurements in two ways. Conditioning-based approaches supply measurement-de...
By Shirin Shoushtari, Edward P. Chandler, Xiao Shi, Ulugbek S. Kamilov
arXiv:2603. 14798v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a machine-learning algorithm for Bayesian inverse problems in the function-space regime.
By Zilan Cheng, Li-Lian Wang, Zhongjian Wang
The paper introduces flow matching as an amortized alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo for sampling from posterior distributions in Bayesian inverse problems. By training a transport map on joint samples of parameters and data, the method produces independent approximate posterior samples for any observation at negligible online cost, eliminating the need for new likelihood evaluations. The authors provide accuracy estimates in total‑variation distance and Kullback‑Leibler divergence, propose a hybrid Metropolized sampler for exactness, and validate the approach on examples such as electrical impedance tomography and a likelihood‑free Lotka‑Volterra model.
By Jan Blechschmidt, Oliver G. Ernst, Moritz Poguntke, Bj\"orn Sprungk
arXiv:2603. 00393v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inverse problems constrained by partial differential equations are often ill-conditioned due to noisy, incomplete data or inherent non-uniqueness.
By Ali Siahkoohi, Kamal Aghazade, Ali Gholami
arXiv:2605. 15407v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider amortized Bayesian inference for nonlinear inverse problems using only samples from the joint distribution of parameters and observations, including problems with unknown functions in a Banach space.
By Ricardo Baptista, Hojjat Kaveh, Andrew M. Stuart
The paper introduces MS-Flow, a method that represents a flow-based generative model’s trajectory as a sequence of intermediate latent states instead of a single initial code. By enforcing local flow dynamics and coupling trajectory segments with matching penalties, the approach alternates between updating latent states and ensuring consistency with observed data. This strategy reduces memory usage and improves reconstruction quality on tasks such as image inpainting, super‑resolution, and computed tomography.
By Alexander Denker, Zeljko Kereta, Carola-Bibiane Sch\"onlieb, Moshe Eliasof
FlowSGS introduces a flow-based posterior sampling method that combines Split Gibbs Sampling (SGS) with Langevin dynamics for the likelihood step and Stochastic Interpolants (SI) for the prior step. By integrating a pretrained flow model into the prior step via SI's reverse-time SDE and a novel timestep correction, FlowSGS reduces the number of network evaluations compared to plug‑and‑play diffusion samplers. Experiments demonstrate state‑of‑the‑art performance on various inverse problems, including the first flow‑based solution to a nonlinear inverse problem (Fourier phase retrieval).
By Tianao Li, Xinhui Qian, Emma Alexander
arXiv:2509. 03910v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We formulate inverse problems in a Bayesian framework and aim to train an invertible generative model that is capable of simulation (i.
By Christoph Brune, Marcello Carioni, Tristan van Leeuwen, Lasse Veenstra
arXiv:2606. 17048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion and flow-based models learn powerful data priors by training a denoiser to reverse Gaussian corruption.
By Abbas Mammadov, Ozgur Kara, Kaan Oktay, Iskander Azangulov, Adil Kaan Akan, Hyungjin Chung, James Matthew Rehg, Yee Whye Teh
arXiv:2606. 26592v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose latent-space diffusion posterior sampling (L-DPS), an approximate Bayesian framework for high-dimensional inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Yuanzhe Wang, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
The paper introduces the Ensemble-conditioned Inverse Problem (EIP), a multivariate statistical framework for inferring an ensemble that follows the pushforward of a prior through a forward process. It applies to fields such as high‑energy physics, full waveform inversion, and inverse imaging, and proposes non‑iterative inference‑time methods using ensemble inverse generative models that avoid explicit forward model use during inference. The authors demonstrate the approach on synthetic and real datasets and provide code for replication.
By Zhengyan Huan, Camila Pazos, Martin Klassen, Vincent Croft, Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin, Shuchin Aeron