arXiv AI

From Geometry to Generalization: Why Row Normalization Can Beat Adam and Muon

The paper demonstrates that row-wise normalization can achieve higher population accuracy than full-batch Adam, a proxy for random-reshuffling Adam, and exact-SVD Muon in high-dimensional multiclass classification. Under an isotropic Gaussian-cloud data model, this advantage stems from row normalization’s class-wise Euclidean geometry preserving decision-boundary directions, whereas Adam’s coordinate-wise geometry and Muon’s spectral geometry introduce distortions. The advantage also persists in more general settings, including class means with independently oriented covariances, power-law spectra with class-mean exponent below one, and even under heavily anisotropic test noise, though it can reverse when covariances are diagonal and close, unless a random rotation aligns them with Adam’s coordinate axes.

arXiv AI
Jun 4

Why Muon Outperforms Adam: A Curvature Perspective

arXiv:2606. 04662v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Muon improves training efficiency over Adam in large language-model training by about two times, but the local geometric source of this advantage remains unclear.

By Shuche Wang, Fengzhuo Zhang, Jiaxiang Li, Dirk Bergemann, Zhuoran Yang
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 2

The Row Normalization Puzzle in Muon

arXiv:2609.39114v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper examines how row-wise renormalization affects Muon, focusing on the gap between NorMuon's worst-case guarantees and its practical performanc...

By Jiayu Zhang, Tianyi Lin
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Spectral Allocation: Why Muon Outperforms Adam, and How to Improve Muon

The paper investigates why the orthogonal optimiser Muon outperforms Adam in large language model pretraining by analysing the spectral properties of Transformer loss landscapes. It finds that Muon’s momentum buffers exhibit an anisotropic spectral profile with a volatile head and a tolerant bulk, enabling larger effective step sizes. Building on this insight, the authors propose Spectral‑Aware Muon (SAMuon) and a lightweight variant, which adjust the bulk scaling while keeping the head unchanged, achieving 13–24 % fewer training tokens than Muon without extra FLOPs.

By Xiaodong Wu, Wenyi Yu, Chao Zhang, Philip Woodland
arXiv Statistics ML
Oct 28

Phases of Muon: When Muon Eclipses SignSGD

The paper analyzes the stochastic optimizer Muon, which orthogonalizes an exponential moving average of minibatch gradients, and compares its behavior to the baseline SignSGD on a high‑dimensional matrix‑valued least squares problem. It derives deterministic dynamics showing Muon’s sensitivity to an effective batch size and its failure to resolve small eigenmodes when whitening is exact and the effective batch is small, while Momentum and finite Newton–Shulz iterations can mitigate this. The study presents a phase diagram in terms of data and target exponents, indicating when Muon or SignSGD is preferable based on covariance spectrum steepness and target loss scaling.

By Elliot Paquette, Noah Marshall, Lucas Benigni, Guangyuan Wang, Atish Agarwala, Courtney Paquette
arXiv AI
Jul 16

Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorization

arXiv:2607. 13246v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Muon has recently emerged as a strong optimizer for large-scale deep learning, where it reshapes gradient updates through approximate orthogonalization and has been reported to outperform Adam and AdamW in large language model training.

By Ali Parviz, Gal Mishne, Alex Cloninger
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Musec: MomentUm SpEctral Clipping for Stable Muon-type Training

Musec introduces MomentUm SpEctral Clipping, an optimizer-level, architecture‑agnostic technique that replaces Muon’s spectral flattening with selective spectral clipping to stabilize training. By clipping singular values above a threshold while preserving the momentum’s spectral structure, Musec addresses loss spikes and unbounded weight growth without requiring architecture‑specific changes. Soft Musec, an efficient implementation using smooth spectral saturation via coupled Newton‑Schulz iterations, offers convergence guarantees in nonconvex nonsmooth stochastic optimization and empirically improves stability across diverse learning rates and model sizes.

By Zhuanghua Liu, Menglian Wang, Luo Luo