The paper introduces two variance‑adaptive variants of the Muon optimizer—Muon‑NSR and Muon‑VS—for language model pretraining. Both methods incorporate gradient‑variance information into Muon’s orthogonalization process without adding extra hyperparameters, preserving its spectral normalization structure. Experiments on Llama‑style and GPT‑2 models ranging from 125 M to 1.2 B parameters show that these variants outperform well‑tuned Muon baselines and achieve up to a 1.33× step‑to‑target speedup on Llama‑1.2B.
By Jingru Li, Yibo Fan, Huan Li
Musec introduces MomentUm SpEctral Clipping, an optimizer-level, architecture‑agnostic technique that replaces Muon’s spectral flattening with selective spectral clipping to stabilize training. By clipping singular values above a threshold while preserving the momentum’s spectral structure, Musec addresses loss spikes and unbounded weight growth without requiring architecture‑specific changes. Soft Musec, an efficient implementation using smooth spectral saturation via coupled Newton‑Schulz iterations, offers convergence guarantees in nonconvex nonsmooth stochastic optimization and empirically improves stability across diverse learning rates and model sizes.
By Zhuanghua Liu, Menglian Wang, Luo Luo
The paper introduces Spectrally Targeted Muon, an optimizer that orthogonalizes only singular values of update matrices above or below a threshold τ, thereby interpolating between normalized SGD and the full Muon optimizer. It uses Newton‑Schulz iteration on a shifted Gram matrix to avoid SVD, and evaluates the method on CIFAR‑10 and NanoGPT, tracking effective rank and a new alignment metric. The study finds that orthogonalizing small singular values is crucial, that shrinking large singular values keeps the parameter spectrum flat, and that AdamW differs mainly in the speed of structure formation compared to Muon.
By Vishrut Goyal, Rohan Ramkumar
arXiv:2608.20818v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The matrix-aware optimizer Muon improves large model training by balancing updates across singular directions, yet its scaling behavior and end-to-en...
By Chenghao Li, Xiao Han, Xinxin Huang, Wei Liu, Boyang Li, Bing Xiao, Heran Zhang, Juanma Perez Rua, Ke Xu, Kangning Liu, Linjun Kuang, Na Li, Tan Wang, Tian Xie, Wei Peng, Yang Pei, Yifan Xu, Yuanhao Zhai, Yuwei Lin, Zhe Wang, Zihao He, Daniel Li, Junbiao Tang, Ziyang Jiang, Dake Chen
The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.
By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
arXiv:2507. 01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW.
By Naoki Sato, Hiroki Naganuma, Hideaki Iiduka