arXiv:2606. 04058v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Orthonormalized update rules have rapidly become a leading choice of optimizer for training large language models, with recent open-source state-of-the-art models adopting Muon.
By Gagik Magakyan, Pablo Parrilo, Asuman Ozdaglar
The paper investigates why the orthogonal optimiser Muon outperforms Adam in large language model pretraining by analysing the spectral properties of Transformer loss landscapes. It finds that Muon’s momentum buffers exhibit an anisotropic spectral profile with a volatile head and a tolerant bulk, enabling larger effective step sizes. Building on this insight, the authors propose Spectral‑Aware Muon (SAMuon) and a lightweight variant, which adjust the bulk scaling while keeping the head unchanged, achieving 13–24 % fewer training tokens than Muon without extra FLOPs.
By Xiaodong Wu, Wenyi Yu, Chao Zhang, Philip Woodland
The paper analyzes the stochastic optimizer Muon, which orthogonalizes an exponential moving average of minibatch gradients, and compares its behavior to the baseline SignSGD on a high‑dimensional matrix‑valued least squares problem. It derives deterministic dynamics showing Muon’s sensitivity to an effective batch size and its failure to resolve small eigenmodes when whitening is exact and the effective batch is small, while Momentum and finite Newton–Shulz iterations can mitigate this. The study presents a phase diagram in terms of data and target exponents, indicating when Muon or SignSGD is preferable based on covariance spectrum steepness and target loss scaling.
By Elliot Paquette, Noah Marshall, Lucas Benigni, Guangyuan Wang, Atish Agarwala, Courtney Paquette
The paper introduces Spectrally Targeted Muon, an optimizer that orthogonalizes only singular values of update matrices above or below a threshold τ, thereby interpolating between normalized SGD and the full Muon optimizer. It uses Newton‑Schulz iteration on a shifted Gram matrix to avoid SVD, and evaluates the method on CIFAR‑10 and NanoGPT, tracking effective rank and a new alignment metric. The study finds that orthogonalizing small singular values is crucial, that shrinking large singular values keeps the parameter spectrum flat, and that AdamW differs mainly in the speed of structure formation compared to Muon.
By Vishrut Goyal, Rohan Ramkumar
arXiv:2607. 20512v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Muon optimizer reaches the grokking threshold on modular arithmetic faster than AdamW.
By Yufeng Wang
arXiv:2507. 01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW.
By Naoki Sato, Hiroki Naganuma, Hideaki Iiduka
arXiv:2606. 27715v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We show that for tall matrix parameters, like projection matrices in the MLP layers, the Muon update can have row norms that are arbitrarily non-uniform.
By Alec Dewulf, Dhruv Pai, Li Yang, Ashley Zhang, Ben Keigwin
arXiv:2607. 14536v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Muon-style optimizers apply a polar map to matrix momentum, but their updates also depend on the representation of each parameter block before orthogonalization.
By Da Chang, Qiankun Shi, Lvgang Zhang, Di He, Yaoshuai Ma, Ganzhao Yuan, Yongxiang Liu
The paper introduces a curvature‑conditioned multiscale momentum algorithm with sphere constraints to accelerate large‑language‑model pretraining. By applying a slow‑decay component for noise reduction and a fast‑decay component for curvature adaptation only along flat directions, the method improves training dynamics without causing parameter inflation. Experiments demonstrate significant speed‑ups for Muon across various architectures and model sizes, and the authors provide theoretical justification for the observed acceleration.
By Shuchen Zhu, Yuxin Fang, Mingze Wang, Kun Yuan
The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.
By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
arXiv:2610.20112v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Prior work on implicit bias shows that gradient descent selects the Frobenius max-margin direction on linearly separable problems, whereas Fan et al. (...
By Yongtao Wu, Mahdi Mansouri, Zhenyu Zhu
arXiv:2509. 14562v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large models recently are widely applied in machine learning, so efficient training of large models has received widespread attention.
By Feihu Huang, Yuning Luo, Songcan Chen