Which Optimizer Leaks Most? Optimizer Implicit Bias as a Training-Data Privacy Controller
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2602. 00329v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliable data attribution is essential for mitigating bias and reducing computational waste in modern machine learning, with the Shapley value serving as the theoretical gold standard.
arXiv:2606. 01527v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine unlearning is motivated by legal and user-facing requirements to remove the influence of individuals' data from trained models, such as the right to be forgotten.
arXiv:2507. 01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW.
arXiv:2607. 27940v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) enables collaborative training without exposing raw data.
The paper introduces the "lift" technique for training input‑convex neural networks, replacing the traditional non‑negative weight constraint enforced by projected gradient descent or a softplus map. By adding a learnable slack variable and an unconstrained network that processes a permutation‑invariant batch summary, the lift couples batch‑dependent latent weights to the gradient, increasing update variance and enabling faster escape from the softplus shoulder. Experiments show that when the softplus method stalls at the shoulder, the lift achieves tighter fits and reconstructs targets roughly three times faster, while both methods agree when the shoulder is rarely reached.
The paper investigates how different optimizers acquire distinct generalizing relations in single‑hidden‑layer ReLU networks. By manipulating nuisance‑connected weights and performing a strict‑parity sweep, the authors show that training conditions reshape both shared failures and relative optimizer advantages, with specific interventions improving accuracy on hard stages. The study also compares optimizer behavior across tasks and an external architecture (CIFAR‑10).