arXiv Machine Learning

Evidence-Grounded Agentic Formulation Development in an Autonomous Laboratory

The paper introduces Andromeda 2, an agentic system that uses structured in‑house experimental evidence to design and run successive batches of self‑emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS). In a miniaturized automated lab, Andromeda 2 outperformed its predecessor Andromeda 1 and a traditional design‑of‑experiments campaign in developing paclitaxel formulations, achieving a 50 % hit rate versus 17 % and 2 % respectively, and identifying 12 formulations meeting all target product profile objectives. The system’s use of evidence‑grounded reasoning increased mean AUC by 34 % and produced a formulation with a 19 % w/w paclitaxel loading, roughly 3.3‑fold higher than a published benchmark.

arXiv AI
Sep 7

La Agente \'Optima: Towards Agentic Self-Driving Laboratories

La Agente ’Optima is an agentic framework that builds and manages Bayesian optimization campaigns for self‑driving laboratories, separating large language model reasoning from campaign execution. It maintains a persistent optimization state, allowing consistent repetitive loops and auditable decisions, and only returns control to the agent when interpretation or revision is needed. In tests on digital discovery tasks and physical platforms, it corrected measurement failures, improved yields, and recommended formulation changes, outperforming human‑directed campaigns in cost and material usage.

By Marcel M\"uller, Jiaru Bai, Willi Gottstein, Abhijoy Mandal, Mohammad Nazeri, Elia Savino, Yanlin Fang, Sujoy Das, Sergio Pablo Garc\'ia Carrillo, Yeonghun Kang, Juan B. P\'erez-S\'anchez, Simone Pilon, Martin Fitzner, Timothy No\"el, Frank Gu, Varinia Bernales, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik
arXiv AI
Jun 30

LUMEN: Cost-Transparent Multi-Agent Pipeline for Automated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

arXiv:2606. 28362v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MA) remain the gold standard for evidence synthesis, yet completing one typically requires 67 weeks and substantial expert effort.

By Yen-Hsun Huang (Department of Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan), Yu-Shiou Lin (Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan)
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Probe Before You Edit: Probing-Guided Molecular Optimization for LLM Agents in Structure-Based Drug Design

arXiv:2606. 00555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Structure-based drug design increasingly employs LLM agents to iteratively refine ligands against a target pocket, yet a viable ligand must satisfy two often-conflicting objectives -- binding affinity and druggability -- which single optimization steps rarely improve together.

By Zaifei Yang, Weiyu Chen, Yaqing Wang, James Kwok
arXiv AI
Aug 19

GxP-Agent: Process-DAG Topology for Reliable Clinical Trial Programming with LLM Agents

GxP-Agent is a multi‑agent system that transforms clinical trial protocols into CDISC‑compliant datasets by encoding the regulatory workflow as a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Each node in the DAG represents a domain‑specific task executed by a worker agent with specialized skill context, validation gates, and conditional retry logic. On the CDISC‑Bench benchmark, GxP-Agent with Claude Sonnet 4.6 achieved a perfect 100 % structural match for 49 variables across 254 records, outperforming single‑agent and flat multi‑agent baselines and enabling weaker models like GPT‑4.1 to reach 59.2 % under the same DAG.

By Jaime Yan
arXiv AI
Sep 15

ClinicalReTrial: Clinical Trial Redesign with Self-Evolving Agents

ClinicalReTrial is a multi‑agent AI system that treats clinical trial protocol optimization as an iterative redesign problem on textual documents. It combines failure diagnosis, safety‑aware modifications, and candidate evaluation within a closed‑loop, reward‑driven framework, using a predictive model as a simulation environment for low‑cost, dense feedback. The system achieves a 56.7% conversion of failed protocols to predicted successes, with a 7.4% average success probability increase at a negligible cost, and its redesign patterns align with real‑world expert changes.

By Sixue Xing, Kerui Wu, Xuanye Xia, Haoyu He, Meng Jiang, Jintai Chen, Tianfan Fu
arXiv AI
Aug 13

A Modular Agentic Framework for Synthetically Constrained Multi-Objective Hit-to-Lead Optimization

arXiv:2608. 11483v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hit-to-lead optimization requires iterative design of hit analogs across competing potency, selectivity, physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, safety, and synthetic constraints.

By Kelvin P. Idanwekhai, Enes Kelestemur, Benjamin Strickland, Matthew Hart, Steini Davidsson, Angelos Angelopoulos, Ron Alterovitz, Marcello DeLuca, Alexander Tropsha
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Predicting Quantifiability from Primary Screens to Prioritize Dose-Response Profiling

The paper introduces a framework to predict whether a compound’s potency can be quantified in dose‑response profiling, treating quantifiability as a separate triage goal from biological activity. It shows that features from low‑cost primary screens, rather than molecular structure, strongly predict quantifiability, and that this prediction holds across new chemical scaffolds and assay families. The authors argue that incorporating quantifiability predictions can better allocate expensive dose‑response resources.

By Sean Lim
arXiv AI
Jul 1

A Self-Evolving Agentic System for Automated Generation and Execution of Biological Protocols

arXiv:2606. 31763v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous wet-lab experimentation requires more than plausible protocol text: biological intent, quantitative procedures, device constraints and experimental feedback must remain aligned from protocol and SOP design to code and physical execution.

By Yankai Jiang, Weiting Tang, Haoran Sun, Zhenyu Tang, Yuejie Hou, Yingnan Han, Rubo Wang, Yueyuxiao Yang, Cheng Liang, Lilong Wang, Wenjie Lou, Xiaosong Wang, Lei Bai, Meng Yang
arXiv AI
Aug 26

LLM Agents Perform Controlled Experiments Using Simulation Models

The paper introduces a multi‑agent framework that lets large language models (LLMs) perform controlled experiments using scientific simulation models, specifically for pharmaceutical process design. Given a user query and baseline configuration, the system builds a structured task, designs and runs comparative simulations, interprets outcomes, and generates evidence‑based recommendations for optimizing process parameters. By integrating high‑fidelity simulations with LLMs, the approach yields more specific, actionable outputs and improves user‑rated correctness and helpfulness compared to language‑only reasoning.

By Yuchen Xia, Michael Weyrich, Nasser Jazdi, Johannes St\"umpfle, Johannes Sigel, Akshay Narla, Gavin K. Reynolds, Anna Jawor-Baczynska, Pol Llopart