arXiv AI By Yuchen Xia, Michael Weyrich, Nasser Jazdi, Johannes St\"umpfle, Johannes Sigel, Akshay Narla, Gavin K. Reynolds, Anna Jawor-Baczynska, Pol Llopart

LLM Agents Perform Controlled Experiments Using Simulation Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces a multi‑agent framework that lets large language models (LLMs) perform controlled experiments using scientific simulation models, specifically for pharmaceutical process design. Given a user query and baseline configuration, the system builds a structured task, designs and runs comparative simulations, interprets outcomes, and generates evidence‑based recommendations for optimizing process parameters. By integrating high‑fidelity simulations with LLMs, the approach yields more specific, actionable outputs and improves user‑rated correctness and helpfulness compared to language‑only reasoning.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 12

Masked Diffusion Language Agents for Tool-Integrated Chemical Reasoning

The paper introduces ChemDiffAgent, a masked diffusion language agent designed for tool‑integrated chemical reasoning. Unlike traditional autoregressive agents, it treats reasoning as iterative denoising over interleaved reasoning and tool‑use trajectories, allowing joint decision making under full‑trajectory context. A two‑stage post‑training framework further refines tool use and reasoning, and the authors benchmark the model on six chemistry tasks, reporting a ~20% performance gain over autoregressive baselines and competitive results against larger models.

By Mengdi Liu, Chenghao Jia, Hong Chang, Shiguang Shan
arXiv AI
Jul 22

Agents in the Wild: Where Research Meets Deployment

arXiv:2607. 19336v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic systems large language model (LLM) based architectures capable of reasoning, planning, acting, and coordinating with tools and other agents are rapidly transitioning from research prototypes to production scale deployments across domains such as software engineering, scientific discovery, and finance.

By Grace Hui Yang, Pranav N. Venkit, Hooman Sedghamiz, Enrico Santus, Victor Dibia, Ioana Baldini
arXiv AI
Oct 16

Amortizing Sequential Experimental Design in Reasoning LLMs

The paper proposes a method to embed sequential Bayesian experimental design (BED) into large language models (LLMs) by training the models to reason about action selection using information-gain rewards. By specifying the experimental generative model separately from the LLM’s beliefs, the authors optimize expected information gain under a chosen model. Experiments on the Twenty Questions task show that the resulting policies outperform both inference- and training-time BED baselines while incurring lower computational costs, and the approach generalizes to unseen categories and transfers positively to the Medi-Q clinical dialogue benchmark.

By Anita Kriz, Antonin Berthon, Nicol\'as Astorga, Mihaela van der Schaar
arXiv AI
Oct 2

LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarios

The article surveys LLM-based agentic reasoning frameworks, presenting a unified formal language that categorizes them into single-agent, tool-based, and multi-agent methods. It reviews application scenarios in scientific discovery, healthcare, software engineering, society, economics, and general-purpose tasks, and compares the distinct features and evaluation strategies of each category. The survey highlights the rapid development of complex agentic systems in real-world contexts.

By Bingxi Zhao, Lin Geng Foo, Ping Hu, Christian Theobalt, Hossein Rahmani, Jun Liu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 28

M3OS: A Monte Carlo Graph Search-Orchestrated Multi-Agent LLM System for Evidence-Traced Molecular Optimization

M3OS is a multi‑agent large‑language‑model system that separates molecular‑design reasoning from optimization‑state management using a Monte Carlo graph search. The system maintains a persistent graph of evaluated candidates, transformations, and evidence, while LLM agents use role‑specific contexts to generate and edit molecules with tool‑driven and knowledge‑guided approaches. Across three benchmarks, M3OS outperforms baselines, demonstrating the benefit of persistent search state, specialized agents, and controlled execution for multi‑constraint molecular optimization.