arXiv AI

What Matters in Quality-Aware VLA Pretraining: A Benchmark and Empirical Study

The paper investigates how to best utilize demonstration quality during vision‑language‑action (VLA) pretraining to boost downstream task performance. It compares weighting, filtering, and conditioning strategies across different reward definitions and label granularities, using 5,000 suboptimal human demonstrations and 24 target tasks while keeping demonstration sets and training budgets matched. The study introduces AXIS‑Bench, a benchmark built on crowdsourced simulation demonstrations that allows recomputation of quality labels and replayable trajectories for both simulation and real‑world tasks, showing that simulation pretraining can raise real‑world success rates from 9.6% to 31.7%.

arXiv AI
Jun 16

Retrieve, Don't Retrain: Extending Vision Language Action Models to New Tasks at Test Time

arXiv:2606. 15631v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Extending a vision-language-action (VLA) policy to a new task typically requires task-specific teleoperated demonstrations and per-task fine-tuning, making adaptation costly in both data collection and compute.

By Jeongeun Park, Juhan Park, Taekyung Kim, Sungjoon Choi, Dongyoon Han, Sangdoo Yun
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 12

TraceICL: Thread-Resolved Demonstration Curation with Consistency Calibration for Robust Multimodal In-Context Learning

The paper introduces AVA, a training‑free framework that improves interleaved multimodal in‑context learning for frozen large vision‑language models. AVA decomposes the interleaved context into per‑sample threads, selects influential demonstrations while removing redundancy, and calibrates consistency using a weak sibling model’s confidence. Across five vision‑language benchmarks, AVA raises performance by up to 2.4 points, narrows the visual performance gap on ScienceQA‑IMG, and remains robust even with 30% noisy demonstrations, all while keeping the LVLM frozen and adding only modest latency.

By Yigit Yilmaz, Elena Petrova, Mehmet Kaya, Lucia Rossi, Amir Rahman
arXiv Computer Vision
1d ago

When Vision Overrides Language: Evaluating and Mitigating Counterfactual Failures in VLAs

Vision‑Language‑Action models (VLAs) often fail to follow language instructions because they rely on vision shortcuts learned from biased datasets. The authors introduce LIBERO‑CF, a counterfactual benchmark that tests language following by providing alternative task instructions for the same scene layouts, revealing widespread counterfactual failures. They propose Counterfactual Action Guidance (CAG), a dual‑branch inference scheme that amplifies language conditioning, which consistently improves language grounding and task success across diverse VLAs without requiring extra data or architectural changes.

By Yu Fang, Yuchun Feng, Dong Jing, Jiaqi Liu, Yue Yang, Zhenyu Wei, Daniel Szafir, Mingyu Ding
arXiv AI
Jun 2

VLM4VLA: Revisiting Vision-Language-Models in Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv:2601. 03309v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, which integrate pretrained large Vision-Language Models (VLM) into their policy backbone, are gaining significant attention for their promising generalization capabilities.

By Jianke Zhang, Xiaoyu Chen, Qiuyue Wang, Mingsheng Li, Yanjiang Guo, Yucheng Hu, Jiajun Zhang, Shuai Bai, Junyang Lin, Jianyu Chen
arXiv AI
Jul 24

TOPReward: Token Probabilities as Hidden Zero-Shot Rewards for Robotics

arXiv:2602. 19313v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: General-purpose robot learning requires dense, instruction-conditioned feedback that can distinguish meaningful task progress from stalled, failed, or partially completed behavior.

By Shirui Chen, Cole Harrison, Ying-Chun Lee, Angela Jin Yang, Zhongzheng Ren, Lillian J. Ratliff, Jiafei Duan, Dieter Fox, Ranjay Krishna
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

Same Scene, Different Task: Skill Alignment for Compositional Generalization in VLAs

The paper introduces CRAFT, a method for improving compositional generalization in vision‑language‑action (VLA) models. It addresses the issue where models rely on visual shortcuts during fine‑tuning, leading them to execute demonstrated skill combinations that match observations rather than the instructed ones. By training with counterfactual instruction–observation pairs and transferring supervision through reusable skill representations, CRAFT enhances success on unseen skill combinations while preserving performance on demonstrated ones across multiple VLA models and benchmarks.

By Taegeun Yang, Youngju Na, Yoonki Cho, Sung-Eui Yoon
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 23

Watch and Learn: Teaching Visual In-Context Learning by Removing Textual Shortcuts

The paper introduces MIME, a task‑agnostic visual in‑context learning (vICL) dataset that removes textual shortcuts by omitting explicit rules linking demonstration images to answers, forcing models to infer the rule visually. Fine‑tuning vision‑language models on MIME boosts vICL accuracy by 8.1–18.0 points across three VLMs while preserving single‑image performance and improving multi‑image and text‑only in‑context learning. The authors also propose DTAD, a technique that randomly drops demonstration labels during training to encourage visual inference, achieving comparable accuracy with more consistent attention to demonstration images and outperforming frontier models on the TrueMICL benchmark.

By Nimrod Shabtay, Asaf Yehudai, Avihu Dekel, Eli Schwartz, Raja Giryes
arXiv AI
Oct 26

TTT in VLA Models: Exploring Training with Human Demonstrations

The paper investigates integrating Test‑Time Training (TTT) into InternVLA‑A1 and Pi0.5 to enable robots to generate actions conditioned on human demonstrations. By training on paired demonstration and robot trajectory data, the authors explore memory transfer, truncated backpropagation, and contrastive regularization across video, short‑video, and single‑frame cue tasks. Experiments show that, at the current scale, adding TTT and paired training does not consistently improve target selection from demonstrations, and even single‑frame cues still lead robots to prefer cups at fixed positions.

By Qiangong Zhou, Jiafeng Liang, Yimin Dong, Yang He, Hongxiang Li