Natural language processing

Classical and neural NLP: translation, question answering, tokenization and the evaluation of language understanding.

1,375 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Jun 29

POTracker: Optimizing Large Language Models for Standard-Compliant Power Outage Report Generation

arXiv:2606. 23533v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) are good at general text generation, but it is still hard to use them for domain-specific data generation because the output must follow strict formatting and structural rules.

By Hung Phan, Aniroop Naladala, Dubey Avanindra, Supryia Chinthavali, Lunga Dalton, Ali Jannesari
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 29

Are Time-Series Foundation Models Ready for E-Nose Data? An Empirical Assessment of Their Embeddings

arXiv:2606. 27672v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inspired by advances in natural language processing and computer vision, "time-series foundation models" (TSFMs) have recently been introduced with the promise of strong generalization across diverse time-series tasks, including forecasting, classification, and anomaly detection, as well as across domains such as healthcare, climate science, and manufacturing.

By Taeyeong Choi, Mohammed Kamruzzaman
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 29

ARMOR: Adaptive Retriever Optimization for Low-Resource Telecom Question Answering

Telecom question answering (QA) is a challenging setting for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG): evidence is fragmented across standards, papers, encyclopedic resources, and web documents, and answers often hinge on technical tables, equations, and specialized protocol language. In low-resource subdomains, generator fine-tuning can over-specialize and degrade general capability, making query-side retriever adaptation an attractive alternative.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 27

AB-RAG: Adaptive Budgeted Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Question Answering

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become the standard way to ground large language models in external knowledge, yet most systems retrieve a fixed number of passages for every question regardless of its difficulty. This wastes computation on easy questions, starves hard ones, and gives no signal for when a generated answer can be trusted.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26

Just how sure are you? Improving Verbalized Uncertainty Calibration in Medical VQA

arXiv:2606. 27023v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) applied to Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) tend to produce overconfident outputs regardless of actual correctness, and existing verbalized confidence calibration methods, developed primarily for text only LLMs, do not account for the multimodal nature of medical image understanding.

By Eren Senoglu, Federico Toschi, Nicolo Brunello, Andrea Sassella, Mark James Carman
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26

Kolmogorov Arnold networks (KAN) for aerodynamic prediction: a comparison with MLPs and GNNs

arXiv:2606. 27126v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Kolmogorov Arnold networks (KAN) have recently been introduced as a (deep) neural network architecture whose trainable parameters adapt the activation functions, instead of the coefficients of the affine transformations at the core of traditional architectures such as deep multilayer perceptrons (MLPs).

By Miguel Jaraiz, Fermin Gutierrez, Pablo Yeste, Miguel S\'anchez-Dom\'inguez, Eusebio Valero, Gonzalo Rubio, Lucas Lacasa
arXiv AI
Jun 26

Speaking Numbers to LLMs: Multi-Wavelet Number Embeddings for Time Series Forecasting

arXiv:2606. 26487v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are attractive for context-aware time series forecasting because they can integrate heterogeneous textual signals, yet their discrete, language-oriented tokenization and embedding interfaces are misaligned with continuous numerical values, often harming numerical ordering and forecasting reliability.

By Defu Cao, Zijie Lei, Muyan Weng, Jiao Sun, Yan Liu
arXiv AI
Jun 26

Ask, Don't Judge: Binary Questions for Interpretable LLM Evaluation and Self-Improvement

arXiv:2606. 27226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating LLM outputs remains a major bottleneck in NLP: human evaluation is expensive and slow, lexical metrics correlate poorly with human judgments on open-ended generation, and holistic LLM judges often produce opaque scores that are hard to debug.

By Sangwoo Cho, Kushal Chawla, Pengshan Cai, Zefang Liu, Chenyang Zhu, Shi-Xiong Zhang, Sambit Sahu