arXiv Computer Vision

Found but Not Read: When Extracted Text Closes the Retrieval-Reading Gap in Document Vision-Language Models

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

From Retrieval to Recognition:How Vision--Language Models Become OCR Specialists

The paper investigates how general vision‑language models (VLMs) develop specialized optical character recognition (OCR) capabilities. By applying a causal intervention protocol, the authors identify sparse, stable OCR‑head sets in several VLMs and show that these heads largely overlap with textual retrieval/copy heads found in general VLMs. The study concludes that full‑sequence OCR functions as a dense multimodal copy‑and‑paste mechanism, and that when a VLM is fine‑tuned for OCR, it largely preserves the same head identities while redistributing their functional and causal strengths.

By Yuanxiang Huangfu, Hanmeng Zhong, Linqing Chen, Jeffrey Tiong Jee Hui
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 1

Can Retrieval Heads See Images? Multimodal Retrieval Heads in Long-Context Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2605.27243v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large vision-language models increasingly rely on long-context modeling to reason over documents, hour-level videos, and long-horizon agent traject...

By Aaron Branson Cigres Li, Zhaowei Wang, Yu Zhao, Yiming Du, Haobo Li, Xiyu Ren, Ginny Wong, Simon See, Lishu Luo, Haodong Duan, Pasquale Minervini, Yangqiu Song
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

Layout-Guided Masking for GROBID: Lightweight Structural Gains in Large-Scale Scientific PDF Ingestion

The paper introduces a lightweight CPU-based extension to GROBID that uses layout-guided masking to identify figure, table, and paratext regions in scientific PDFs. By routing tokens to specialized GROBID models or discarding them, the method improves structural accuracy on PMC corpora and enhances figure caption recovery. It also achieves competitive table detection and body‑text precision compared to vision‑based GPU parsers while operating entirely on CPU and costing significantly less.

By Luca Foppiano, Sana Khamassi, Vipul Gupta
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

Invoice Haystack: Benchmarking Document Retrieval and Visual Question Answering Under Strong Visual Homogeneity

The paper introduces Invoice Haystack, a benchmark of 1,500 anonymized invoices and 200 question‑answer pairs that tests document retrieval and visual question answering under strong visual homogeneity. It shows that existing benchmarks suffer from embedding collapse, with Invoice Haystack’s mean pairwise cosine similarity at 0.73 versus 0.38 and 0.31 in DocHaystack and InfoHaystack. The authors propose VL‑RAG, a hybrid retrieval‑augmented generation framework that combines text and visual embeddings and a VLM‑based verification filter, achieving 60.0% Recall@1 on Invoice Haystack‑500 and improving performance on other benchmarks.

By Heethanjan Kanagalingam, Thenukan Pathmanathan, Mokeeshan Vathanakumar, Basim Azam, Sarah Monazam Erfani, Naveed Akhtar
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

VisDocAgentBench: Benchmarking Agents for Visually Rich Document Retrieval

VisDocAgentBench is a closed‑corpus benchmark that evaluates static versus agentic retrieval for visually rich documents, using 2,375 pages from 100 documents and 120 queries that span direct, one‑bridge, and two‑bridge evidence structures. The benchmark includes semantic, relational, and visual queries, full‑document review, and hard‑negative validation. Results show that a strong visual retriever performs well on direct items but poorly on two‑bridge items, while agents improve performance, especially when using visual retrieval and iterative search capabilities.

By Lexiang Hu, Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Dingkun Long, Yikang Li, Fuwei Zhang, Yisen Wang, Zhouchen Lin
arXiv Computation and Language
6d ago

From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Driven Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings

The paper introduces a controlled benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on key‑value pair extraction from documents with varying levels of OCR noise. It tests 136 configurations across five instruction‑tuned open‑weight LLMs, three datasets, and four text‑quality conditions, using deterministic decoding to generate 17,688 document‑level inferences. The study finds that clean‑text performance does not reliably predict real‑world robustness, model rankings can reverse under noisy conditions, and few‑shot demonstrations do not always improve accuracy, highlighting reliability risks in OCR‑to‑LLM pipelines.

By Zahra Anvari
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

L\"etzCross: A Cross-Lingual Page-Level Benchmark for Multimodal Retrieval over Luxembourgish Documents

arXiv:2608.21714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent page-image retrievers such as ColPali have improved retrieval over visually rich documents, yet little is known about how they behave in cross-l...

By Omar El Bachyr, Fred Philippy, Laura Maria Bernardy, Saad Ezzini, Jacques Klein, Tegawende Bissyande
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

Retrieval Heads Meet Vision: Uncovering How VLMs Locate and Extract Visual Information

The paper introduces Visual Retrieval Heads (VRHs), a small fraction of attention heads in vision‑language models that are causally responsible for grounding text descriptions to image regions. By recasting head‑scoring methods and evaluating across eleven VLMs and five benchmarks, the authors show that masking the top 20 VRHs can drop grounding accuracy by up to 80 percentage points, while random masking has little effect. VRHs generalize across various visual reference tasks, preserve output format while corrupting localization, and transfer causally across models sharing an LLM backbone.

By Chanho Park, Daehyeon Choi, Jihyun Lee, Minhyuk Sung