The paper presents a dual‑matrix computational framework that quantifies morphological and theological differences among 196 Hindu and Vajrayana Buddhist esoteric deities. It uses a Gower distance matrix with a new Cardinality Weighting algorithm for physical form and dense vector embeddings from LLMs for theological function, revealing how visual forms can mask shared functions and how high‑cardinality symbols cluster orthodox and Tantric entities. The study demonstrates near‑identical coordinates for the Hindu Chinnamasta and Buddhist Chinnamunda, and releases the architecture as an open‑source tool for Digital Humanities research.
By Ankit Bhattacharjee
The paper investigates whether panels of vision‑language models (VLMs) can reliably judge image aesthetics. It shows that a panel of holistic judges rarely outperforms its best member, but when each model scores images on five rubric‑defined dimensions and these dimension scores are fused across model families, the panel consistently beats the best single VLM on two datasets (EVA and PARA). The study demonstrates that the value of a panel depends on the type of input it receives, and that dimension‑based fusion yields measurable gains at the cost of additional labeling and API usage.
By Amit Jadhav, Shaurya Beriwala, Beomjin Kim
The paper introduces RECAP, a redundancy-aware credit assignment method that improves reasoning efficiency in large language models by assigning credit to each reasoning step based on its downstream role and contribution to the correct answer. RECAP uses a semantic dependency graph to measure structural responsibility and evaluates step efficacy via changes in gold-answer log-likelihood, enabling step-specific updates without requiring a separate reward model or concise trajectories. Experiments on two 7B models across four mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that RECAP enhances the accuracy-efficiency trade-off, boosting pass@1 by 2.0–3.7 percentage points while cutting reasoning tokens by 8–31% compared to GRPO.
By Yuqing Zhou, Hong Wang, Manqing Mao, Zhuoer Wang, Samson Koelle, Jie Yuan, Yanjun Lin, James Feng, Nikki Lijing Kuang, Ziwei Zhu, Wei Niu
arXiv:2609.28283v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Several foundation models dedicated to hyperspectral images have recently been made available. These models are trained on large unlabeled datasets and...
By Edgard Dabier, Christophe Kervazo, Pietro Gori, Florence Tupin
arXiv:2609.28434v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis is defined as a lateral curvature of the spine that develops during adolescence, without known cause. The condition can...
By Owen Pullen, Amir Jamaludin, Andrew Zisserman
arXiv:2609.27389v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Audio language models understand what is said far better than how it sounds. Closing this gap takes more than data. Detailed acoustic annotation is c...
By Yuxiang Wang, Shengbo Cai, Yingda Shen, Ming-Hao Hsu, Qinke Ni, Liqiang Zhang, Teddy Sun, Steve Yevs, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv:2409.13568v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Accurate delineation of agricultural field boundaries is essential for effective crop monitoring and resource management. However, competing method...
By Foivos I. Diakogiannis, Zheng-Shu Zhou, Jeff Wang, Gonzalo Mata, Dave Henry, Roger Lawes, Amy Parker, Peter Caccetta, Suzanne Furby, Rodrigo Ibata, Ondrej Hlinka, Jonathan Richetti, Kathryn Batchelor, Chris Herrmann, Andrew Toovey, John Taylor
The paper argues that large language models (LLMs) organize their internal mathematical reasoning by reusable reasoning approaches rather than by the benchmark topics they are tested on. Using a generation‑replay protocol, the authors extract activation‑importance signatures from eight models across five math sources, cluster these signatures, and find that the resulting groups align more closely with reasoning approaches than with topics. The study shows that changing the requested reasoning approach shifts cluster assignments, while paraphrasing the prompt does not, underscoring the primacy of approach over topic in LLM reasoning.
By Sajad Goudarzi, Samaneh Zamanifard, Moloud Nasiri, Hamed Rahimian
The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) balance capability and efficiency when using Chain-of-Thought reasoning on arithmetic and algorithmic tasks. It finds that while larger models solve more problems correctly, the improvement follows an exponential decay that slows with scale, indicating diminishing returns. Additionally, the length of reasoning output grows with problem size but does not improve with larger models, suggesting efficiency does not benefit from scaling.
By Moritz Laber, Zohair Shafi, Germans Savcisens, Brennan Klein, Matteo Chinazzi, Samuel V. Scarpino, Albert-L\'aszl\'o Barab\'asi, Tina Eliassi-Rad
The paper introduces Newton-Schulz Attention (NS-Attn.), a parameter‑free transformation that applies a finite Newton‑Schulz polynomial step to the output of each attention head in Vision Transformers. By normalizing each head’s feature‑by‑token matrix with its Frobenius norm, applying the NS step, and restoring the norm, the method aims to reduce spectral concentration and increase effective rank before merging heads. Experiments on ViT and Swin models over CIFAR‑10 and CIFAR‑100 show consistent accuracy gains of 0.25–0.83 percentage points, though with added inference latency.
By Xiaohe Jiang (University of Exeter), Guoqiang Zhang (University of Exeter), Tianjin Huang (University of Exeter), Ronghui Mu (University of Exeter)
arXiv:2609.27981v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: KV-cache eviction is typically evaluated through average quality-memory trade-offs, yet a small average loss can hide requests whose utility degrades...
By Beomgu Kang, SoJin Yun, Hojoon Kim, Hyunseok Seo
arXiv:2609.27988v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Methods operating on Vision Transformer (ViT) feature spaces typically rely on Euclidean distance or cosine similarity. This assumes that every direc...
By Andrew Bond, Ege Erdem \"Ozl\"u, Tuna \c{C}imen, Ilkin Umut Melanlioglu, Tolga Birdal, Erkut Erdem, Aykut Erdem
arXiv:2609.28007v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Most Turkish-capable large language models (LLMs) are evaluated using general-purpose benchmarks rather than long, structurally complex domain docume...
By Imtiaz Ul Hassan, \"Oyk\"u Akbulut, Onur Kaya, Ardhendu Behera, Swagat Kumar, Peter Matthew, Yonghuai Liu
arXiv:2609.27220v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Diffusion language models generate text through iterative denoising, exposing intermediate trajectories before final answers are produced. We identify...
By Guoshenghui Zhao, Tan Yu, Weijie Zhao
arXiv:2609.27717v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Human-written agent skills encode rich workflows for real-world problem solving, but are typically used as external inference-time instructions rather...
By Zhilong Ge, Yuting Shao, Yutao Yang, Yuxuan Cai, Jie Zhou, Kai Chen, Bo Zhang, Qin Chen, Liang He
arXiv:2609.28029v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The key-value (KV) cache of autoregressive transformers can be viewed as a fourth-order tensor spanning attention heads, tokens, features, and groupe...
By Rahul Krishnan, Volker Schulz
arXiv:2609.26986v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: For multimodal large language models, when images or speech conflict with accompanying text, measured text reliance can entangle modality preference wi...
By Zhuoyun Li, Boxuan Wang, Xiaowei Huang, Yi Dong
arXiv:2609.27051v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Language-model agents now run the whole of quantitative factor research: they propose investment factors, backtest them, select the survivors and retir...
By Bo Qu, Mingguang Chen, Licheng Wang
arXiv:2609.27197v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Minimum Risk Training (MRT) enables neural machine translation models to directly optimize sequence-level evaluation metrics instead of relying only on...
By Hung Phan, Waqwoya Abebe, Youssef Hussein, Supriya Chinthavali, Dalton Lunga, Ali Jannesari
arXiv:2609.27284v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We present Hunyuan-A13B, an open-source large language model based on a Mixture-of-Experts architecture. It contains 80 billion total parameters but ac...
By Tencent Hunyuan Team, Ao Liu, Botong Zhou, Can Xu, Chayse Zhou, ChenChen Zhang, Chengcheng Xu, Chenhao Wang, Decheng Wu, Dengpeng Wu, Dian Jiao, Dong Du, Dong Wang, Feng Zhang, Fengzong Lian, Guanghui Xu, Guanwei Zhang, Hai Wang, Haipeng Luo, Han Hu, Huilin Xu, Jiajia Wu, Jianchen Zhu, Jianfeng Yan, Jiaqi Zhu, Jihong Zhang, Jinbao Xue, Jun Xia, Junqiang Zheng, Kai Liu, Kai Zhang, Kai Zheng, Kejiao Li, Keyao Wang, Lan Jiang, Lixin Liu, Lulu Wu, Mengyuan Huang, Peijie Yu, Peiqi Wang, Qian Wang, Qianbiao Xiang, Qibin Liu, Qingfeng Sun, Richard Guo, Ruobing Xie, Saiyong Yang, Shaohua Chen, Shihui Hu, Shuai Li, Shuaipeng Li, Shuang Chen, Suncong Zheng, Tao Yang, Tian Zhang, Tinghao Yu, Weidong Han, Weijie Liu, Weijin Zhou, Weikang Wang, Wesleye Chen, Xiao Feng, Xiaoqin Ren, Xingwu Sun, Xiong Kuang, Xuemeng Huang, Xun Cao, Yanfeng Chen, Yang Du, Zhen Yang, Yangyu Tao, Yaping Deng, Yi Shen, Yigeng Hong, Yiqi Chen